留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

盐酸金刚乙胺纯度标准物质研制

李付凯 王敏 周剑 杨梦瑞 王彤彤 李亮

李付凯,王敏,周剑,等. 盐酸金刚乙胺纯度标准物质研制[J]. 计量科学与技术,2023, 67(10): 37-45 doi: 10.12338/j.issn.2096-9015.2023.0317
引用本文: 李付凯,王敏,周剑,等. 盐酸金刚乙胺纯度标准物质研制[J]. 计量科学与技术,2023, 67(10): 37-45 doi: 10.12338/j.issn.2096-9015.2023.0317
LI Fukai, WANG Min, ZHOU Jian, YANG Mengrui, WANG Tongtong, LI Liang. Preparation of Rimantadine Hydrochloride Purity Certified Reference Material[J]. Metrology Science and Technology, 2023, 67(10): 37-45. doi: 10.12338/j.issn.2096-9015.2023.0317
Citation: LI Fukai, WANG Min, ZHOU Jian, YANG Mengrui, WANG Tongtong, LI Liang. Preparation of Rimantadine Hydrochloride Purity Certified Reference Material[J]. Metrology Science and Technology, 2023, 67(10): 37-45. doi: 10.12338/j.issn.2096-9015.2023.0317

盐酸金刚乙胺纯度标准物质研制

doi: 10.12338/j.issn.2096-9015.2023.0317
基金项目: 国家重点研发计划项目(2022YFF0607904);中国农业科学院所级基本科研业务费项目(1610072023014、1610072023101);中国农业科学院科技创新工程(CAAS-ASTIP-2023-IQSTAP)。
详细信息
    作者简介:

    李付凯(1990-),中国农业科学院农业质量标准与检测技术研究所副研究员,研究方向:功能复合材料制备及标准物质研制,邮箱:Fk_liHarrison@163.com

    通讯作者:

    王敏(1964-),中国农业科学院农业质量标准与检测技术研究所研究员,研究方向:农产品质量与安全,邮箱:wangmin@caas.cn

  • 中图分类号: TB99

Preparation of Rimantadine Hydrochloride Purity Certified Reference Material

  • 摘要: 采用“质量平衡法”和“定量核磁法”两种独立方法研制了盐酸金刚乙胺纯度标准物质(GBW10262)。对标准物质研制过程中的关键因素,如均匀性、稳定性、定值和不确定度等进行了系统研究。两种方法测得的盐酸金刚乙胺纯度值为99.7%±0.3%(k=2)。所研制的盐酸金刚乙胺标准物质均匀性良好,长期稳定性可保持20个月,并且在7天内保持稳定(50 °C)。同时,对定值、稳定性、均匀性等不确定度来源进行了评估。所研制的盐酸金刚乙胺有证标准物质将为仪器检定、方法验证、质量安全风险监测等实施提供支撑。
  • 图  1  盐酸金刚乙胺红外光谱

    Figure  1.  Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectra of rimantadine hydrochloride

    图  2  盐酸金刚乙胺UPLC-QE高分辨质谱

    Figure  2.  Ultra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) Q-Exactive Orbitrap mass spectrometry (MS) spectra of rimantadine hydrochloride

    图  3  盐酸金刚乙胺气相色谱-质谱

    Figure  3.  GC-MS spectra of rimantadine hydrochloride

    图  4  盐酸金刚乙胺1H核磁共振谱

    Figure  4.  1H NMR spectra of rimantadine hydrochloride

    图  5  盐酸金刚乙胺中主要杂质碎片谱图

    Figure  5.  Spectra of major impurity fragments in rimantadine hydrochloride

    图  6  替硝唑核磁谱图

    Figure  6.  Proton quantitative nuclear magnetic resonance (1H qNMR) spectrum of tinidazole

    图  7  盐酸金刚乙胺核磁谱图

    Figure  7.  Proton quantitative nuclear magnetic resonance (1H qNMR) spectrum of rimantadine hydrochloride CRM

    图  8  替硝唑和盐酸金刚乙胺混合核磁谱图

    Figure  8.  Proton quantitative nuclear magnetic resonance (1H qNMR) spectrum of a mixture of tinidazole and rimantadine hydrochloride CRM

    图  9  盐酸金刚乙胺均匀性检验纯度

    Figure  9.  Results from the homogeneity testing of rimantadine hydrochloride CRM

    图  10  盐酸金刚乙胺长期稳定性趋势图

    Figure  10.  Long-term stability of rimantadine

    图  11  盐酸金刚乙胺短期稳定性趋势图

    Figure  11.  Short-term stabilityof rimantadine

    图  12  盐酸金刚乙胺有证标准物质不确定度来源示意图

    Figure  12.  Cause-and-effect diagram for uncertainty sources in rimantadine hydrochloride CRM

    表  1  盐酸金刚乙胺中水分含量(%)

    Table  1.   Percentage of moisture content in rimantadine hydrochloride

    样品水分含量平均值标准偏差
    10.110.130.022
    20.17
    30.13
    40.15
    50.12
    60.16
    70.11
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  盐酸金刚乙胺中氯离子摩尔含量(mmol)

    Table  2.   Molar content of chloride ions in rimantadine hydrochloride

    样品氯离子摩尔含量平均值标准偏差
    10.0048020.0046110.000214
    20.004385
    30.004723
    40.004743
    50.004858
    60.004520
    70.004246
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3  盐酸金刚乙胺的质量平衡法定值结果(%)

    Table  3.   Purity determination of rimantadine hydrochloride CRM using the mass balance method

    样品有机纯度水分含量挥发性组分不挥发性组分定值结果
    199.960.110.01460.014899.82
    299.920.1799.72
    399.970.1399.81
    499.900.1599.72
    599.970.1299.82
    699.890.1699.70
    799.850.1199.71
    平均值99.920.130.01460.014899.76
    标准偏差0.0430.022--0.0520
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  4  盐酸金刚乙胺的定量核磁法定值结果(%)

    Table  4.   Purity determination of rimantadine hydrochloride CRM using the qNMR method

    样品 $ \dfrac{{I}_{\mathrm{x}}}{{I}_{\mathrm{s}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{d}}} $ $ \dfrac{{N}_{\mathrm{s}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{d}}}{{N}_{\mathrm{x}}} $ $ \dfrac{{M}_{\mathrm{x}}}{{M}_{\mathrm{s}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{d}}} $ $ \dfrac{{m}_{\mathrm{s}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{d}}}{{m}_{\mathrm{x}}} $ $ P_{\mathrm{q}\mathrm{N}\mathrm{M}\mathrm{R}\mathrm{ }} $
    1 0.5652 2 0.8726 1.0121 99.82
    2 0.5883 2 0.8726 0.9726 99.84
    3 0.5866 2 0.8726 0.9747 99.78
    4 0.5699 2 0.8726 1.0015 99.59
    5 0.5652 2 0.8726 1.0102 99.64
    6 0.5758 2 0.8726 0.9926 99.74
    7 0.5765 2 0.8726 0.9906 99.65
    平均值 99.72%
    标准偏差 0.10%
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  5  盐酸金刚乙胺不确定度评估(%)

    Table  5.   Uncertainty evaluation for rimantadine hydrochloride CRM

    不确定度来源 计算公式 不确定度
    均匀性 $ \dfrac{\sqrt{\dfrac{{{s}_{2}}^{2}}{n}}*\sqrt[4]{\dfrac{2}{{v}_{2}}}}{\stackrel{-}{X}} $ 0.0107
    长期稳定性 $ \dfrac{\mathrm{s}\left({\beta }_{1}\right)\times t}{\stackrel{-}{X}} $ 0.021
    短期稳定性 $ \dfrac{\mathrm{s}\left({\beta }_{1}\right)\times t}{\stackrel{-}{X}} $ 0.011
    质量平衡法 $ \dfrac{{P}_{{\mathrm{HPLC-AN}}}.\sqrt{{\left(\dfrac{u\left({P}_{0}\right)}{{P}_{0}}\right)}^{2}+\dfrac{{u}^{2}\left({X}_{w}\right)+{u}^{2}\left({X}_{n}\right)+{u}^{2}\left({X}_{v}\right)}{{(1-{X}_{w}-{X}_{n}-{X}_{v})}^{2}}}}{\stackrel{-}{X}} $ 0.138
    定量核磁法 $ \sqrt{{\left(\dfrac{u\left({I}_{\mathrm{x}}/{I}_{\mathrm{s}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{d}}\right)}{{I}_{\mathrm{x}}/{I}_{\mathrm{s}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{d}}}\right)}^{2}+{\left(\dfrac{u\left({M}_{\mathrm{x}}\right)}{{M}_{\mathrm{x}}}\right)}^{2}+{\left(\dfrac{u\left({M}_{\mathrm{s}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{d}}\right)}{{M}_{\mathrm{s}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{d}}}\right)}^{2}+{\left(\dfrac{u\left({m}_{\mathrm{x}}\right)}{{m}_{\mathrm{x}}}\right)}^{2}+{\left(\dfrac{u\left({m}_{\mathrm{s}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{d}}\right)}{{m}_{\mathrm{s}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{d}}}\right)}^{2}+{\left(\dfrac{u\left({p}_{\mathrm{s}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{d}}\right)}{{p}_{\mathrm{s}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{d}}}\right)}^{2}} $ 0.151
    定值 $ \sqrt{\left[\dfrac{u_{\mathrm{r}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{l}}\left(P_{\mathrm{M}\mathrm{B}}\right)}{2}\right]^2+\left[\dfrac{u_{\mathrm{r}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{l}}\left(P_{\mathrm{q}\mathrm{N}\mathrm{M}\mathrm{R}}\right)}{2}\right]^2} $ 0.102
    相对不确定度 $ \sqrt{u_{\mathrm{char},\mathrm{r}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{l}}^2+u_{\mathrm{bb},\mathrm{r}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{l}}^2+u_{\mathrm{lts},\mathrm{r}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{l}}^2+u_{\mathrm{sts},\mathrm{r}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{l}}^2} $ 0.106
    包含因子 k 2
    扩展不确定度 $ k\times u\mathrm{_{CRM}} $ 0.3
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] Dolin R, Reichman R C, Madore H P, et al. A controlled trial of amantadine and rimantadine in the prophylaxis of influenza a infection[J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1982, 307: 580-584. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198209023071002
    [2] 张美, 朱莉莎, 徐飘飘, 等. 高效液相色谱-串联质谱法同时检测鸡蛋中金刚乙胺和金刚烷胺药物残留研究[J]. 中国家禽, 2023, 45(2): 71-76. doi: 10.16372/j.issn.1004-6364.2023.02.012
    [3] Hubsher G, Haider M, Okun M S. Amantadine: The journey from fighting flu to treating Parkinson disease[J]. NEUROLOGY, 2012, 78: 1096-1099. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31824e8f0d
    [4] 中华人民共和国农业部公告第560号[Z]. http://www.moa.gov.cn/nybgb/2005/dsyq/201806/t20180618_6152552.htm.
    [5] 陆淳, 张鑫, 吴剑平, 等. 抗病毒药物在动物组织中残留检测方法进展[J]. 中国兽医杂志, 2016, 52(6): 66-68. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0529-6005.2016.06.014
    [6] 赵军强, 韩典峰, 田秀慧, 等. 食品中金刚烷胺的危害、检测方法和残留风险研究进展[J]. 中国渔业质量与标准, 2022, 12(3): 64-71. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1833.2022.03.010
    [7] 孙玲玲, 霍江莲, 陈冬东, 等. 液相色谱-串联质谱法同时测定鸡蛋中4种抗病毒药物残留[J]. 质量安全与检验检测, 2023, 33(5): 6-13,30.
    [8] 王小乔, 李坚, 许晓辉, 等. QuEChERS-UPLC-MS/MS测定鱼肉中3种抗病毒药物残留[J]. 中国兽药杂志, 2023, 57(8): 35-42.
    [9] 欧阳思, 雨蓝伟, 贾佳, 等. 超高效液相色谱-串联质谱法同时测定鸡肉、鸡蛋中尼卡巴嗪、金刚烷胺、金刚乙胺残留量[J]. 现代食品, 2022, 28(23): 138-141,147. doi: 10.16736/j.cnki.cn41-1434/ts.2022.23.037
    [10] 张季, 凌蕾, 卢叶, 等. 同位素内标-UPLC-MS/MS法同时测定羊肉中金刚烷胺和金刚乙胺的残留量[J]. 广州化工, 2022, 50(4): 106-108. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-9677.2022.04.035
    [11] Zhang T, Zhang L, Liu J X, et al. Development of a molecularly imprinted microspheres-based microplate fluorescence method for detection of amantadine and rimantadine in chicken[J]. FOOD ADDITIVES AND CONTAMINANTS PART A-CHEMISTRY ANALYSIS CONTROL EXPOSURE & RISK ASSESSMENT, 2021, 38(7): 1136-1147.
    [12] Nuchtavorn N, Sudprasert C, Yurai P, et al. A simple and rapid microplate fluorescence determination of adamantanes in pharmaceutical formulations[J]. CHEMICAL PAPERS, 2020, 74: 1859-1865. doi: 10.1007/s11696-019-01035-x
    [13] Wang Z, Wang X, Wang Y, et al. Simultaneous determination of five antiviral drug residues and stability studies in honey using a two-step fraction capture coupled to liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry[J]. JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2021, 1638: 461890. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2021.461890
    [14] Sidiropoulou G, Kabir A, Furton K G, et al. Combination of fabric phase sorptive extraction with UHPLC-ESI-MS/MS for the determination of adamantine analogues in human urine[J]. MICROCHEMICAL JOURNAL, 2022, 176(10): 107250.
    [15] ISO. Reference materials-selected terms and definitions : Guide ISO. 30[S]. ISO: Geneva, 2015.
    [16] 于亚东, 刘媛. ISO/REMCO关于标准物质的新定义[J]. 化学分析计量, 2008, 2: 64-65. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-6145.2008.02.021
    [17] 国家市场监督管理总局. 标准物质的定值及稳定性、均匀性评估: JJF 1343-2022 [S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2022.
    [18] Wang S, Wu P, Li M, et al. Mass balance method for SI-traceable purity assignment of synthetic oxytocin[J]. JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL AND BIOMEDICAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 207: 114401. doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2021.114401
    [19] Wang S, Wang S, Li P, et al. Establishment of SI-traceable purity assessment of Fumonisin B1 using a combination of quantitative 1H NMR and mass balance[J]. MICROCHEMICAL JOURNAL, 2023, 185: 108282. doi: 10.1016/j.microc.2022.108282
    [20] Westwood S, Choteau T, Daireaux A, et al. Mass Balance Method for the SI Value Assignment of the Purity of Organic Compounds[J]. ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2013, 85: 3118-3126. doi: 10.1021/ac303329k
    [21] Liu H, Cheow P S, Yong S, et al. Determination of purity values of amino acid reference materials by mass balance method: An approach to the quantification of related structure impurities[J]. ANALYTICAL AND BIOANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2020, 412: 8023-8037. doi: 10.1007/s00216-020-02936-7
    [22] Guo Q, Li Z, Shen L, et al. Quantitative 1H nuclear magnetic resonance (qHNMR) methods for accurate purity determination of glucosinolates isolated from Isatis indigotica roots[J]. PHYTOCHEMICAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 32: 104-111. doi: 10.1002/pca.3003
    [23] Zhou J, Li F, Wang M, et al. Preparation of clorprenaline certified reference material: Purity determination and uncertainty evaluation[J]. MICROCHEMICAL JOURNAL, 2022, 179: 107502. doi: 10.1016/j.microc.2022.107502
    [24] Chen W, Jin W, Fang H, et al. Development of a new taurine purity certified reference material[J]. MICROCHEMICAL JOURNAL, 2022, 181: 107761. doi: 10.1016/j.microc.2022.107761
    [25] Zhang L, Yuan P H, Yang D Z, et al. Purity and uncertainty study of CRM Betulin by DSC[J]. NATURAL PRODUCTS AND BIOPROSPECTING, 2020, 10: 317-324. doi: 10.1007/s13659-020-00261-1
    [26] Bruni G, Berbenni V, Milanese C, et al. Determination of the nateglinide polymorphic purity through DSC[J]. JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL AND BIOMEDICAL ANALYSIS, 2011, 54: 1196-1199. doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2010.12.003
    [27] 苏斌, 张宝喜, 毕研才, 等. 咖啡酸国家一级纯度标准物质的研制[J]. 医药导报, 2023, 42(8): 1192-1198.
    [28] 国家质量监督检验检疫总局. 一级标准物质技术规范: JJF 1006-1994 [S]. 北京: 中国计量出版社, 1994.
    [29] Quan C. Establishment of the purity values of carbohydrate certified reference materials using quantitative nuclear magnetic resonance and mass balance approach[J]. FOOD CHEMISTRY, 2014, 153: 378-386. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.12.086
    [30] 国家质量监督检验检疫总局. 标准物质研制生产机构通用技术要求: JJF 1342-2012 [S]. 北京: 中国质检出版社, 2012.
  • 加载中
图(12) / 表(5)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  84
  • HTML全文浏览量:  34
  • PDF下载量:  13
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2023-11-28
  • 录用日期:  2023-12-04
  • 修回日期:  2023-12-05
  • 网络出版日期:  2023-12-14
  • 刊出日期:  2023-10-18

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回