Development and Experimental Study of an Automatic Verification Device for Alpha and Beta Surface Contamination Monitors
-
摘要: 为提升检定仪器的效率和准确性,降低α、β表面污染仪检定过程中人工操作仪器、人工读数和记录对检定结果的影响,基于自动化技术和机器视觉算法研制了一套α、β表面污染仪自动检定装置。该装置包括双层换源转盘、基于机器视觉技术的图像训练软件和基于C#语言编写的自动检定控制软件。对装置进行了检定流程、硬件结构和软件优化设计,并在软件中增加了识别异常结果检验算法,可根据目标识别区域的特点进行条件筛选和异常数据剔除,提高了光学字符识别(OCR)正确率。开展了识别率测试、本底影响测试、比对测试和自动检定流程测试,检验了该装置的性能。结果证明,该装置对原始数据的识别率达到100%,装置内平面源的集中放置没有产生额外的本底干扰,使用手动定位支架和自动检定装置的测量结果的最大相对偏差为−6.0%,两结果在不确定度范围内一致性较好。该装置在满足JJG 478-2016要求的基础上,优化了辐射防护和源的固有安全性,提高了检定工作效率。Abstract: To enhance the efficiency and accuracy of instrument verification and reduce the impact of manual operation, reading, and recording on verification results of alpha and beta surface contamination monitors, an automatic verification device was developed based on automation technology and machine vision algorithms. The device comprises a double-layer source-changing turntable, image training software based on machine vision technology, and automatic verification control software written in C#. The verification process, hardware structure, and software were optimized, and an algorithm for identifying abnormal results was incorporated into the software. This algorithm can perform conditional filtering and abnormal data elimination based on the characteristics of the target recognition area, improving the accuracy of optical character recognition (OCR). Performance tests, including recognition rate testing, background influence testing, comparative testing, and automatic verification process testing, were conducted. Results show that the device achieves a 100% recognition rate for original data, with no additional background interference from the centralized placement of planar sources within the device. The maximum relative deviation of measurement results between manual positioning brackets and the automatic verification device is -6.0%, showing good consistency within the uncertainty range. While meeting the requirements of JJG 478-2016, this device optimizes radiation protection and inherent source safety, significantly improving verification efficiency.
-
Key words:
- metrology /
- radiation protection /
- automatic verification /
- surface contamination /
- machine vision /
- anomaly detection
-
表 1 表面发射率响应对比结果
Table 1. Comparison results of surface emission rate response
测量档 核素 平面源序号 测量方式 净计数率/(s−1) 表面发射率响应 相对扩展不确定度(k=2)/(%) 表面发射率响应相对偏差/(%) α Am-241 1 手动 19.0 0.43 3.7 0.68 自动 19.1 0.43 4.3 2 手动 97.0 0.57 3.0 0.81 自动 97.8 0.57 3.0 3 手动 50.7 0.43 2.9 0.51 自动 50.9 0.43 3.2 4 手动 293.5 0.43 2.6 0.86 自动 296.1 0.44 2.6 β Tl-204 5 手动 5.5 0.73 10 0.37 自动 5.5 0.73 15 6 手动 7.1 0.89 16 −6.0 自动 6.7 0.84 15 7 手动 169.1 0.76 2.4 −1.8 自动 161.2 0.72 2.4 表 2 自动检定测试结果
Table 2. Test results of automatic verification
参数名称 仪器序号 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 α β α β α β α β α β α β α β α β 本底计数率/(s−1) 0.0 14.4 0.0 19.7 0.0 11.4 0.0 11.5 0.0 11.3 0.0 13.4 0.0 15.8 0.0 16.1 表面发射率响应 0.50 0.80 0.50 0.59 0.34 0.36 0.39 0.45 0.47 0.61 0.49 0.50 0.45 0.64 0.51 0.68 重复性/(%) 1.2 2.7 1.3 2.4 1.3 2.0 1.5 2.2 1.3 2.4 1.3 2.4 1.0 2.4 1.2 3.2 相对固有误差/(%) 4.4 23.0 2.5 14.0 3.9 −7.1 2.6 −5.1 −4.2 −14.0 2.0 −7.4 2.0 15.8 3.6 13.0 检定结果 合格 合格 合格 合格 合格 合格 合格 合格 检定总时长 220分钟 -
[1] 石晓亮, 钱公望. 放射性污染的危害及防治措施[J]. 工业安全与环保, 2004, 30(1): 6-9. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-425X.2004.01.002 [2] 宋家斑, 韩刚, 陆小军, 等. α、β表面污染仪的应用与计量性能现状分析[J]. 上海计量测试, 2020, 47(3): 40-42. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-2235.2020.03.013 [3] 刘佳煜, 赵超, 李小双, 等. α, β表面污染仪表面发射率响应的影响因素[J]. 上海计量测试, 2020, 47(3): 6-13. [4] 全国电离辐射计量技术委员会. α、β表面污染仪检定规程: JJG 478-2016[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2016. [5] 姜明奎, 焦鸿雁, 郑智胜, 等. 车载式温湿度表自动检定装置的研究[J]. 计量与测试技术, 2020, 47(7): 32-33. [6] 王法光, 周晓华, 杨维. 电测量仪表自动检定装置的设计[J]. 数字技术与应用, 2021, 39(5): 124-126. [7] 孙嫣, 黄磊, 任燕. 基于机器人的温度传感器自动检定系统设计[J]. 电子测量技术, 2021, 44(9): 56-65. [8] 曾麟, 杨远超, 悦进, 等. 气体活塞式压力计基准量值传递自动化研究[J]. 计量学报, 2021, 42(10): 1316-1322. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1158.2021.10.09 [9] 王贵勇, 朱林茂, 祝铁柱, 等. 基于光电轴角编码器的扭转角度校准系统研究[J]. 机电工程, 2021, 38(3): 373-377. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4551.2021.03.017 [10] 张力玲, 黄杨清, 蔡永洪, 等. 基于机器视觉技术的钢直尺自动检定系统设计[J]. 机电工程技术, 2023, 52(4): 30-32,50. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-9492.2023.04.007 [11] 陈雪, 骆昕, 姚铭殊, 等. 基于PLC的砝码自动化检定装置控制系统研制[J]. 计量科学与技术, 2022, 66(8): 26-31. [12] 张巍, 骆昕, 林家春. 基于 PLC 的标准布氏硬度机的自动控制系统[J]. 机电工程, 2020, 37(2): 211-215. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4551.2020.02.020 [13] 王月胜, 廖维, 朱宇洁. 一种改进的非接触式静电电压表自动校准装置研制[J]. 计量科学与技术, 2023, 67(2): 48-52. doi: 10.12338/j.issn.2096-9015.2022.0119 [14] Vaughn C D, Strouse G F. The NIST Industrial Thermometer Calibration Laboratory[C]. Berlin: International Symposium on Temperature and Thermal Measurements in Industry and Science 8th, 2011. [15] Strouse G F , Mangum B W , Vaughn C D , et al. A New NIST Automated Calibration System for Industrial-Grade Platinum Resistance Thermometers[J]. Springer New York, 2011, 10: 6225. [16] Pope J, Johnson A, Filla B, et al. NIST's Fully Dynamic Gravimetric Liquid Flowmeter Standard[C]. Arlington: 9th International Symposium on Fluid Flow Measurement, 2015. [17] Gudkov K V, Mikheev M Y, Yurmanov V A, et al. A method of automatic verification of Coriolis flowmeters in the field[J]. Measurement Techniques, 2012, 55(2): 151-155. doi: 10.1007/s11018-012-9932-z [18] 李建鹏, 邹君臣, 刘江涛, 等. 电子皂膜流量自动检定装置的研制[J]. 计量科学与技术, 2020(8): 19-23. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0771.2020.08.04 [19] Hung T S, Yung C W, Lih H S, et al. Automatic calibration system for micro-displacement devices[J]. Measurement Science and Technology, 2018, 29(8): 084003. doi: 10.1088/1361-6501/aacac8 [20] Jiao Y, Chen Q, Bao Z W, et al. An on-line anomaly identifying method for calibration devices in an automatic verification system for electricity smart meters[J]. Measurement, 2021, 180: 109606. doi: 10.1016/j.measurement.2021.109606 [21] 李领录. 微量进样器自动检定软件系统的设计和应用[J]. 中国计量, 2021(5): 76-78. [22] 姚艳玲, 姚顺和, 张志勇. 一种旋转式α、β表面污染仪校准及检定装置: 201810224454.5[P]. 2020-11-13. [23] HETAL J VALA, ASTHA BAXI. A review on otsu image segmentation algorithm[J]. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Engineering & Technology, 2013, 2(2): 387-389. [24] 潘志东, 张俊杰, 毛传林, 等. 一种表面污染仪全自动检定装置及方法: 201911058950.9[P]. 2020-04-17. [25] 韩刚, 陆小军, 李小双, 等. 标准平面源与探测器窗的一致性对α、β表面污染仪表面发射率响应测量结果影响及修正[J]. 上海计量测试, 2018, 45(3): 2-4. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-2235.2018.03.003 [26] 张婷婷, 马明栋, 王得玉. OCR文字识别技术的研究[J]. 计算机技术与发展, 2020, 30(4): 85-88. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-629X.2020.04.016 [27] 郭宪军, 赵海旭, 姚新, 等. 声呐图像分割中的改进 Otsu算法[J]. 声学与电子工程, 2018(2): 1-4. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-2657.2018.02.001 [28] DUAA ALSAEED, AHMED BOURIDANE, ALIEL-ZAART. A novel fast otsu digital image segmentation method[J]. The International Arab Journal of Information Technology, 2016, 13(4): 427-433. [29] Jiang G, Jie Y. An adaptive algorithm for text detection from natural scenes [C]. Kauai: Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE computer society conference on computer vision and pattem recognition, 2001. [30] Ma Y W, Wang B, Hu H T. Hybrid model for Chinese character recognition based on Tesseract-OCR[J]. International Journal of Internet Protocol Technology, 2020, 13(2): 102-108. doi: 10.1504/IJIPT.2020.106316 [31] 曾悦, 马明栋. 基于Tesseract_OCR文字识别的研究[J]. 计算机技术与发展, 2021, 31(11): 76-80. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-629X.2021.11.013 [32] 孙瑞彬, 钱夔, 徐伟敏, 等. 基于Tesseract-OCR的复杂发票自适应识别[J]. 南京信息工程大学学报, 2021, 13(3): 349-354. [33] 全国法制计量管理计量技术委员会. 测量不确定度评定与表示: JJF 1059.1-2012[S]. 北京: 中国质检出版社, 2013. -