Understanding and Evaluating the Durability of Weighing Instruments

SHENG Baizhan

doi:10.12338/j.issn.2096-9015.2020.0146

Volume 65 Issue 12

Dec. 2021

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Metrology Science and Technology > 2021 > 65(12): 17-21, 65

SHENG Baizhan. Understanding and Evaluating the Durability of Weighing Instruments[J]. Metrology Science and Technology, 2021, 65(12): 17-21, 65. doi: 10.12338/j.issn.2096-9015.2020.0146

Citation:

SHENG Baizhan. Understanding and Evaluating the Durability of Weighing Instruments[J]. Metrology Science and Technology, 2021, 65(12): 17-21, 65. doi: 10.12338/j.issn.2096-9015.2020.0146

SHENG Baizhan. Understanding and Evaluating the Durability of Weighing Instruments[J]. Metrology Science and Technology, 2021, 65(12): 17-21, 65. doi: 10.12338/j.issn.2096-9015.2020.0146

Citation:

SHENG Baizhan. Understanding and Evaluating the Durability of Weighing Instruments[J]. Metrology Science and Technology, 2021, 65(12): 17-21, 65. doi: 10.12338/j.issn.2096-9015.2020.0146

PDF( 502 KB)

Understanding and Evaluating the Durability of Weighing Instruments

doi: 10.12338/j.issn.2096-9015.2020.0146

SHENG Baizhan

Nanjing Saimo-Sanai Industral Autocontrol Equipments Co., Ltd, Nanjing 211106, China

Available Online: 2021-11-01
Publish Date: 2021-12-01

Abstract

Abstract

Shared description of "durability" from various standards is summarized. The difference between "durability" and "stability" is analyzed. The essence of wear-out and life regarding durability of non-disposable weighing instruments is pointed out. The test objects, test items, test occasions and test sites for evaluating the durability of weighing instruments are analyzed. Based on the understanding of the durability of weighing instruments, discussions are made on the durability test clauses in existing international recommendations or national standards. Difference between the in-service inspections carried out by legal metrology institutes and by users are examined. The following items are compared for durability tests made on type evaluation, on initial verification and subsequent verification, and on in-service inspection carried out by legal metrology institutes or users: test occasions, test objects, test functions, test purposes, test proposers and executors, test sites and working conditions, the criteria of durability, and the documents in which the test results should be included.
- weighing instrument,
- durability,
- stability,
- pattern evaluation,
- verify,
- intermediate checks

FullText(HTML)

References(21)

References

[1]	OIML TC9. Metrological regulation for Load cells: OIML R60: 2017[S/OL]. (2018-02-05)[2019-05-18]. https://www.oiml.org/en/files/pdf_r/r060-p-e17.pdf.
[2]	OIML TC9/SC1. Non-automatic weighing instruments: OIML76: 2006[S/OL]. (2007-12-19)[2019-05-18]. https://www.oiml.org/en/files/pdf_r/r076-p-e06.pd.
[3]	OIML TC9/SC2. Continuous totalizing automatic weighing instruments (belt weighers): OIML R50: 2014[S/OL](2015-03 -26)[2019-05-18].https://www.oiml.org/en/files/pdf_r/r050-p-e14.pdf.
[4]	OIML TC9/SC2. Automatic catchweighing instruments: OIMLR51: 2006[S/OL]. (2008-03-03)[2019-05-18] https://www.oiml.org/en/files/pdf_r/r051-p-e06.pdf.
[5]	OIML TC9/SC2. Non-automatic weighing instruments: OIML R61: 2017[S/OL] (2018-08-02)[2019-05-18]. https://www.oiml.org/en/files/pdf_r/r061-p-e17.pdf.
[6]	OIML TC9/SC2. Automatic rail-weighbridges: OIML R106: 2011[S/OL] (2012-02-13)[2019-05-18]. https://www.oiml.org/en/files/pdf_r/r106-p-e11.pdf.
[7]	OIML TC9/SC2. Discontinuous totalizing automatic weighing instruments (totalizing hopper weighers): OIML R107: 2007[S/OL] (2008-06-02)[2019-05-18]. https://www.oiml.org/en/files/pdf_r/r107-p-e07.pdf.
[8]	OIML TC9/SC2. Automatic instruments for weighing road vehicles in motion and measuring axle loads: OIML R134: 2006 [S/OL]. (2008-09-15)[2019-05-18]. https://www.oiml.org/en/files/pdf_r/r134-p-e06.pdf.
[9]	全国电工电子可靠性与维修性标准化技术委员会. 可靠性维修性术语: GB/T 3187-1994[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 1994.
[10]	中国人民解放军总装备部电子信息基础部. 可靠性维修性保障性术语: GJB 451A-2005[S]. 北京: 总装备部军标发行出版部, 2005.
[11]	IEC TC1. International electrotechnical vocabulary part 192 Dependability: IEC 60050(192): 2015[S/OL] (2015-02) [2019-05-18]. https://webstore.iec.ch/preview/infoiec60050-192%7Bed1.0%7Db.pdf.
[12]	United States Department of Defense. Mechanical Equipment and Subsystems Integrity Program: MIL—STD- 1798-88 [S/OL] [2019-05-18]. https://systems engineering standards and specif.emilspec.com/IL-STD-1798/page17.html.
[13]	ГОСТ ТК119. Надежность в технеке основвые понятия. Термины и Определения: ГОСТ 27.002-89 [S/OL]. [2019-05-18]. http://www.doc88.com/p-6999184761708.html.
[14]	OIML TC1. International vocabulary of terms in legal metrology (VIML): OIML V1: 2013 (E/F) [S/OL]. (2013-12-29) [2019-05-18]. https://www.oiml.org/en/files/pdf_v/v001-ef13.pdf.
[15]	JCGM WG2. International Vocabulary of Metrology – Basic and General Concepts and Associated Terms (VIM): OIML V2-200: 2012 (E) [S/OL](2012-04-18)[2019-05-18]. https://www.oiml.org/en/files/pdf_v/v002-200-e12.pdf.
[16]	胡强. 连续累计自动衡器(皮带秤)耐久性测评方法研究[J]. 计量技术, 2018(9): 68-71.
[17]	OIML TC3/SC1. Pattern evaluation and pattern approval: OIMLD19: 1988[S/OL]. (2002-10-31)[2019-05-18]. https://www.oiml.org/en/files/pdf_d/d019-e88.pdf.
[18]	全国衡器标准化技术委员会. 非自动衡器: G B/T 23111-2008[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2009.
[19]	全国衡器标准化技术委员会. 连续累计自动衡器(皮带秤): G B/T 7721-2017[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2017.
[20]	全国衡器计量技术委员会. 连续累计自动衡器(皮带秤): JJG 195-2002[S]. 北京: 中国计量出版社, 2003.
[21]	National Institute of Standards and Technology. Belt Conveyor Scale Systems//Specifications, Tolerances and Other Technical Requirements for Weighing and Measuring Devices: NIST HB-44[S/OL]. Washington: 2008. [2019-05-18]. https://www.nist.gov/publications/.