International Comparison of Carbonate pH Primary Measurement Method

XIU Hongyu; WU Bing; HE Xinyang

doi:10.12338/j.issn.2096-9015.2020.9045

Volume 65 Issue 9

Sep. 2021

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Metrology Science and Technology > 2021 > 65(9): 31-34, 71

XIU Hongyu, WU Bing, HE Xinyang. International Comparison of Carbonate pH Primary Measurement Method[J]. Metrology Science and Technology, 2021, 65(9): 31-34, 71. doi: 10.12338/j.issn.2096-9015.2020.9045

Citation:

XIU Hongyu, WU Bing, HE Xinyang. International Comparison of Carbonate pH Primary Measurement Method[J]. Metrology Science and Technology, 2021, 65(9): 31-34, 71. doi: 10.12338/j.issn.2096-9015.2020.9045

Citation:

PDF( 801 KB)

International Comparison of Carbonate pH Primary Measurement Method

doi: 10.12338/j.issn.2096-9015.2020.9045

National Institute of Metrology, Beijing 100029, China

Available Online: 2021-05-08
Publish Date: 2021-09-01

Abstract

Abstract

The process of the Chinese aqueous solution acidity (pH) primary standard participating in three international comparisons of carbonate pH measurements is briefly described. A systematic error in the benchmark was found in the 2006 CCQM.K18 and 2007 CCQM.K18.1 comparisons. It was concluded that the negative systematic error was caused by the continuous drift of the electrode potential due to the structure of the primary standard’s Harned-Cell and the low equilibrium potential obtained by using slope inversion. In 2009, the pH primary standard device was modified and improved with a new Harned-Cell structure, and in the international comparison of APMP.QM-K18.2016 in 2020, the international equivalence agreement was achieved, and the degree of equivalent DoE(d_i, U(d_i)) was DoE(−0.0014, 0.0030) .
- international comparison,
- pH,
- carbonate buffer,
- primary measurement method,
- degree of equivalent

FullText(HTML)

References(8)

References

[1]	Measurement comparisons in the CIPM MRA. Guidelines for organizing, participating and reporting: CIPM MRA-G-11[S]. BIPM, 2021.
[2]	RP Buck, S. Rondinini, A. K. Covington, et al. Measurement of pH. Definition, standards, and procedures (IUPAC Recommendations 2002)[R]. IUPAC, 2002.
[3]	Bates R. G. “Determination of pH: Theory and Practice”[M]. Second Edition. United of States of America, 1954.
[4]	Rachel. “Metrology of pH at LNE: State of the art and perspectives”[J]. REVUE FRANÇAISE DE MÉTROLOGIE n°5, 2006(1): 13-21.
[5]	L. Vyskočil, M Máriássy, Susumu Nakamura, et al. Report of key comparison CCQM-K18: pH of carbonate buffer[R]. CCQM, 2006.
[6]	L. Vyskočil, M Máriássy, Marcela Monroy, et al. Final report on subsequent key comparison CCQM-K18.1: pH of carbonate buffer[R]. CCQM, 2007.
[7]	Toshiaki Asakail, Igor Maksimov, Sachiko Onuma, et al. APMP. QM-K18.2016: Key Comparison on pH Measurement of Carbonate Buffer Draft B report (November 16, 2020)[R]. APMP, 2020.
[8]	Jason F. Waters, Michal Máriássy, Frank Bastkowski, et al. Key Comparison CCQM–K18.2016: pH of carbonate buffer final report[R]. CCQM, 2016.