An Auxiliary Device for Large Weighing Mass Comparators

CHEN Lu

doi:10.12338/j.issn.2096-9015.2021.0053

Volume 65 Issue 11

Nov. 2021

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Metrology Science and Technology > 2021 > 65(11): 50-55

CHEN Lu. An Auxiliary Device for Large Weighing Mass Comparators[J]. Metrology Science and Technology, 2021, 65(11): 50-55. doi: 10.12338/j.issn.2096-9015.2021.0053

Citation:

CHEN Lu. An Auxiliary Device for Large Weighing Mass Comparators[J]. Metrology Science and Technology, 2021, 65(11): 50-55. doi: 10.12338/j.issn.2096-9015.2021.0053

CHEN Lu. An Auxiliary Device for Large Weighing Mass Comparators[J]. Metrology Science and Technology, 2021, 65(11): 50-55. doi: 10.12338/j.issn.2096-9015.2021.0053

Citation:

CHEN Lu. An Auxiliary Device for Large Weighing Mass Comparators[J]. Metrology Science and Technology, 2021, 65(11): 50-55. doi: 10.12338/j.issn.2096-9015.2021.0053

PDF( 665 KB)

An Auxiliary Device for Large Weighing Mass Comparators

doi: 10.12338/j.issn.2096-9015.2021.0053

CHEN Lu

Hubei Institute of Metrology and Measurement Technology, Wuhan 430071, China

Available Online: 2021-08-18
Publish Date: 2021-11-01

Abstract

Abstract

In the daily use of large weighing mass comparator, there are often large data fluctuation, reduced accuracy and easy damage of sensor. It is found that during the use of the mass comparator, the application of the corresponding weight lifting method will have a great impact on the use of the mass comparator. In the traditional lifting method, the weight will have a great impact on the table of the mass comparator, which is the main reason for the poor use effect of the mass comparator. In order to solve the above problems, an auxiliary device of mass comparator is designed, and its application effect is analyzed. It is found that the application of the device can greatly improve the repeatability of weighing, reduce the measurement error caused by eccentric load, reduce the data drift and improve the accuracy.
- large weighing,
- mass comparator,
- impact,
- lifting way,
- calibration

FullText(HTML)

References(14)

References

[1]	萨志娟, 高建斌. 质量比较仪校准工作探讨[J]. 质量技术监督研究, 2015(1): 47-49. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-5981.2015.01.010
[2]	姚弘, 陈雪, 王卫忠. 质量比较仪校准规范: JJF1326-2011[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2011.
[3]	王娜, 郭新宇, 行和平. 采用质量比较仪在检定大质量砝码中的一点改进[J]. 计量与测试技术, 2019(9): 20-21.
[4]	孙乐, 余培英, 苏祎. 专用大质量砝码现场校准实例分析[J]. 工业计量, 2013(6): 16-18. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-1183.2013.06.004
[5]	刘炜. 冲击力对大质量检测结果的影响[J]. 衡器, 2019, 48(6): 34-43. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-5729.2019.06.012
[6]	吕金华, 蔡艳. 加载砝码速度对大质量比较仪重复性的影响[J]. 中国计量, 2015(5): 75-76.
[7]	蔡艳, 王志平, 闫立新. F₂等级大质量砝码标准装置现场检测移动实验室的应用[J]. 计量技术, 2015(6): 9-12.
[8]	叶德培, 赵峰, 施昌彦. 测量不确定度评定与表示: JJF1059.1-2012[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2012.
[9]	陈少洁, 郭莹莹, 刘景玉. 校准和测量能力(CMC)评估中常见问题的探讨[J]. 计量与测试技术, 2013, 40(10): 54-57. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-6941.2013.10.030
[10]	杨培富, 于洋, 彭豫龙, 等. 用于大质量比较仪校准的砝码准确度等级的探讨[J]. 计量技术, 2020(2): 131-132.
[11]	刘平, 鲁新光, 王勇. 大质量比较仪校准结果计算及不确定度评定[J]. 衡器, 2013, 42(11): 30-32. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-5729.2013.11.005
[12]	熊忠琪, 余培英, 苏祎, 等. 大质量比较仪偏载误差对砝码检定的影响[J]. 衡器, 2016, 45(7): 27-29, 49. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-5729.2016.07.014
[13]	孙庆军, 李占宏. 冲击对质量比较仪重复性的影响[J]. 中国计量, 2013(11): 104-105. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9364.2013.11.041
[14]	王小三, 梅红伟, 李廷元. 5吨质量比较仪的研制[J]. 宇航计测技术, 2012, 32(6): 25-29. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7202.2012.06.007