Evaluation of Sampling Efficiency in Respirable Dust Samplers Based on the Aerodynamic Method

LIU Jiaqi; ZHANG Guocheng; WU Dan; TIAN Ying; SHEN Shangyi; PAN Yiting; CHOU Jia

doi:10.12338/j.issn.2096-9015.2023.0311

Volume 68 Issue 1

Jan. 2024

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Metrology Science and Technology > 2024 > 68(1): 18-23

LIU Jiaqi, ZHANG Guocheng, WU Dan, TIAN Ying, SHEN Shangyi, PAN Yiting, CHOU Jia. Evaluation of Sampling Efficiency in Respirable Dust Samplers Based on the Aerodynamic Method[J]. Metrology Science and Technology, 2024, 68(1): 18-23. doi: 10.12338/j.issn.2096-9015.2023.0311

Citation:

LIU Jiaqi, ZHANG Guocheng, WU Dan, TIAN Ying, SHEN Shangyi, PAN Yiting, CHOU Jia. Evaluation of Sampling Efficiency in Respirable Dust Samplers Based on the Aerodynamic Method[J]. Metrology Science and Technology, 2024, 68(1): 18-23. doi: 10.12338/j.issn.2096-9015.2023.0311

Citation:

LIU Jiaqi, ZHANG Guocheng, WU Dan, TIAN Ying, SHEN Shangyi, PAN Yiting, CHOU Jia. Evaluation of Sampling Efficiency in Respirable Dust Samplers Based on the Aerodynamic Method[J]. Metrology Science and Technology, 2024, 68(1): 18-23. doi: 10.12338/j.issn.2096-9015.2023.0311

PDF( 893 KB)

Evaluation of Sampling Efficiency in Respirable Dust Samplers Based on the Aerodynamic Method

doi: 10.12338/j.issn.2096-9015.2023.0311

Beijing Institute of Metrology, National Quality Supervision and Inspection Center for Ecological & Environmental Products, Beijing 100029, China

Received Date: 2023-11-24
Accepted Date: 2023-11-28
Rev Recd Date: 2023-12-04

Available Online: 2023-12-08

Publish Date: 2024-01-18

Abstract

Abstract

Respirable dust, defined as particles with an aerodynamic equivalent diameter of less than 7.1 μm that can enter the human lungs during breathing, poses significant health risks and is a source of pneumoconiosis. Its concentration requires stringent monitoring. The respirable dust sampler, a crucial component at the front end of dust concentration measuring instruments in the coal industry, has its efficiency determined by the ability of dust to pass through its pre-separation device. This study introduces a novel detection method for sampling efficiency based on the aerodynamic method, accompanied by a newly developed detection device. This method was applied to test various imported and domestic products. Compared to current standards, this method simplifies the process, directly traces particle size and concentration to the aerodynamic particle size spectrometer, significantly reduces the detection cycle by at least 98%, and offers good repeatability. It is not affected by complex steps like sampling, elution, and solution fluorescence determination, thereby greatly reducing detection costs. Testing revealed that only one out of six models of sampling heads met the required standards, highlighting the urgent need for quality improvement in these products.
- metrology,
- respirable dust sampler,
- aerodynamic method,
- sampling efficiency,
- evaluation system,
- curve fitting

FullText(HTML)

References(33)

References

[1]	李华炜. 煤矿呼吸性粉尘及其综合控制[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2005, 15(7): 67-69. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-3033.2005.07.016
[2]	RISSLER J, GUDMUNDSSON A, NICKLASSON H, et al. Deposition efficiency of inhaled particles (15-5000 nm) related to breathing pattern and lung function: an experimental study in healthy children and adults[J]. Particle and Fibre Toxicology, 2017, 14: 10. doi: 10.1186/s12989-017-0190-8
[3]	SIGAUX J, BITON J, ANDRE E, et al. Air pollution as a determinant of rheumatoid arthritis[J]. Joint Bone Spine, 2018, 86: 37-42.
[4]	GAILLARD S, SARVER E, CAUDA E. A field study on the possible attachment of DPM and respirable dust in mining environments[J]. Journal of Sustainable Mining, 2019, 18(2): 100-108. doi: 10.1016/j.jsm.2019.02.008
[5]	ZHANG T, LI X Y, WANG M F, CHEN H X, et al. Microbial aerosol chemistry characteristics in highly polluted air[J]. Science China (Chemistry), 2019, 62(8): 1051-1063. doi: 10.1007/s11426-019-9488-3
[6]	张军. 煤矿井下呼吸性粉尘的现状与治理[J]. 资源节约与环保, 2019(10): 92-93. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-2251.2019.10.077
[7]	王朔, 赵卫雄, 徐学哲, 等. 北京一次严重雾霾过程气溶胶光学特性与气象条件[J]. 中国环境科学, 2016, 36: 1305-1312. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6923.2016.05.005
[8]	王雪涛, 张鸽. 不同煤种呼吸性粉尘与尘肺病患病风险的剂量-反应关系分析[J]. 中华流行病学杂志, 2020, 41(7): 1068-1071. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112338-20190722-00537
[9]	吴丹, 张国城, 赵晓宁. 光散射法颗粒物监测仪粒径识别检测装置的搭建及方法研究[J]. 计量学报, 2021, 42(3): 388-394. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1158.2021.03.21
[10]	LIDEN G, KENNY L C. Comparison of measured respirable dust sampler penetration curves with sampling conventions[J]. Annals of Occupational Hygiene, 1991(5): 485-504.
[11]	张玉英, 张建华. 粉尘采样器在测定呼吸性粉尘中的应用[J]. 中华劳动卫生职业病杂志, 2001, 19(1): 6. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-9391.2001.01.034
[12]	刘昌凤, 邵龙义, 龚铁强, 等. 煤矿呼吸性粉尘冲击采样器原理与设计探讨[J]. 中原工学院学报, 2006, 17(6): 5-8,22. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-6906.2006.06.002
[13]	WANG H, BHAMBRI P, IVEY J, et al. Design and pharmaceutical applications of a low-flow-rate single-nozzle impactor[J]. International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 2017, 533: 14-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.09.047
[14]	LE T C, TSAI C J. Novel non-bouncing PM_2.5 impactor modified from well impactor ninety-six[J]. Aerosol Science Technology, 2017, 51: 1287-1295. doi: 10.1080/02786826.2017.1341621
[15]	SONG J B, ZHANG Y, ZHU D W, et al. Performance evaluation of virtual cyclone with various inlet and outlet dimensions[J]. Journal of Aerosol Science, 2019, 128: 114-124. doi: 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2018.12.002
[16]	国家质量监督检疫检验总局. 粉尘采样器: GBT 20964-2007 [S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2007.
[17]	煤炭工业部. 呼吸性粉尘测量仪采样效能测定方法: MT 394-1995 [S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 1995.
[18]	刘佳琪, 张国城, 赵晓宁, 等. 进气流量对PM_2.5切割器捕集效率的影响分析[J]. 计量学报, 2021, 42(4): 532-536. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1158.2021.04.20
[19]	刘佳琪, 张国城, 吴丹, 等. 基于静态箱法的PM_2.5切割器捕集效率评价及拟合曲线优化研究[J]. 计量学报, 2021, 42(10): 1398-1403. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1158.2021.10.21
[20]	刘佳琪, 张国城, 吴丹, 等. PM₁₀切割器捕集效率评价装置及方法研究[J]. 环境科学学报, 2021, 41(6): 2340-2346.
[21]	刘佳琪, 张国城, 赵晓宁, 等. 针对工作流量为2 L·min^-1的切割器的捕集效率评价研究[J]. 环境科学学报, 2021, 41(7): 2640-2646.
[22]	刘佳琪, 张国城, 吴丹, 等. PM₁切割器的评价及其与PM_2.5切割器的切换研究[J]. 环境科学学报, 2021, 41(12): 5093-5097.
[23]	刘佳琪, 张国城, 吴丹, 等. 不同种类颗粒物对切割器性能评价的影响研究[J]. 中国测试, 2022, 48(1): 27-31.
[24]	刘佳琪, 张国城, 吴丹, 等. 几种常见非国标法颗粒物切割器性能评价及问题分析[J]. 环境科学学报, 2021, 41(11): 4489-4493. doi: 10.13671/j.hjkxxb.2021.0123
[25]	刘佳琪, 张国城, 吴丹, 等. 混合粒径颗粒物对切割器评价结果的影响研究[J]. 计量学报, 2022, 43(12): 1677-1682. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1158.2022.12.25
[26]	刘佳琪, 张国城, 吴丹, 等. 安德森六级撞击采样器采集效率评价方法研究[J]. 计量学报, 2022, 43(6): 826-830. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1158.2022.06.18
[27]	刘佳琪, 张国城, 吴丹, 等. 基于空气动力学的浮游菌采样器采集物理效率检测方法的研究[J]. 计量学报, 2022, 43(9): 1216-1219. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1158.2022.09.17
[28]	刘佳琪, 张国城, 吴丹, 等. 气旋式生物气溶胶采样器采集物理效率评价方法研究[J]. 计量学报, 2022, 43(10): 1378-1381.
[29]	刘佳琪, 张国城, 田莹, 等. 内标法对PM_2.5切割器快速评价方法的修正[J]. 计量学报, 2023, 44(4): 653-656. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1158.2023.04.24
[30]	环境保护部. 环境空气颗粒物(PM₁₀和PM_2.5)采样器技术要求及检测方法: HJ 93-2013 [S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2013.
[31]	国家环境保护总局. PM₁₀采样器技术要求及检测方法: HJ/T 93-2003 [S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2003.
[32]	THOMAS M P, ROBERT W V, Russell W W. Design and calibration of the EPA PM_2.5 well impactor Nine-Six (WINS)[J]. Aerosol Science and Technology, 2001(34): 389-397.
[33]	修宏宇, 崔伟群, 刘俊杰, 等. 采用蒙特卡洛法评定PM_2.5切割粒径的不确定度[J]. 计量技术, 2017(11): 3-7.