“放管服”改革下的计量器具型式批准制度研究

    A Study of the Type Approval System Reform of Measuring Instruments Based on the Background of “DPIROS”

    • 摘要: 基于“放管服”改革关于简政放权、放管结合、优化服务等基本内涵和改革精神,系统梳理我国计量器具型式批准制度发展现状和问题,比较分析欧盟和美国的型式评价项目管理模式,从“放管服”举措类型、改革主体、针对的问题等维度初步构建我国计量器具型式批准制度改革推进方案,并提出具体改进建议。在计量器具型式批准制度改革推进中,应注重型式批准制度的法制化和规范化运行,进一步明晰强制管理的计量器具目录适用范围,提升型式评价大纲科学合理性,协调统一型式评价技术要求。在生产制造领域,应助力计量器具生产企业提升质量保证体系,明确计量器具生产企业的责任和义务。在监管领域,应加强事中事后监管措施承接,在风险分级的基础上探索专项检查、有因检查等多种形式监督,建立计量器具生产企业的信用评价制度。搭建全国范围内统一的信息化服务平台,提高型式批准的在线政务服务水平和信息公开度,方便企业申报、查询和社会监督。

       

      Abstract: Focused on the "Streamline Administration, Delegate Powers, Improve Regulation and Services" (DPIROS) reform, this paper examines the fundamentals and implications of the DPIROS reform which includes streamlining administration, delegating powers, and optimizing services. The current state and issues associated with the type approval system for measuring instruments in China are systematically reviewed. By analyzing the program management models for type evaluations in the European Union and the United States, an initial type approval reform advancement scheme for China's measuring instruments is proposed. This takes into account DPIROS measures, the reform entities involved, and the specific issues addressed. Concrete recommendations for improvement are also offered. The suggested reforms emphasize the need for legal and standard operations in the type approval system. This includes further clarifying the scope of the catalog of compulsorily managed measuring instruments, enhancing the scientific rationality of type evaluation guidelines, and coordinating unified technical requirements for type evaluation. In the manufacturing sector, efforts should be made to assist manufacturers of measuring instruments in improving their quality assurance systems, while clarifying their responsibilities and obligations. In the regulatory realm, it's recommended to strengthen follow-up regulatory measures, explore diversified supervisory methods such as targeted inspections based on risk grading, and establish a credit rating system for manufacturers of measuring instruments. The paper also advocates the development of a unified national information service platform to enhance online government services, increase information transparency, facilitate enterprise reporting, querying, and social supervision.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回