基于激光扫描法的光阑有效面积计量技术研究

刘志伟; 刘文德; 许宁; 林永杰; 林延东; 徐楠

doi:10.12338/j.issn.2096-9015.2020.9046

基于激光扫描法的光阑有效面积计量技术研究

doi: 10.12338/j.issn.2096-9015.2020.9046

中国计量科学研究院，北京 100029

基金项目: 国家重点研发计划项目资助（2018YFB0504601）

详细信息

作者简介:
刘志伟（1997-），中国计量科学研究院研究生，研究方向：太阳总辐照度计量，邮箱：liuzhw@nim.ac.cn

通讯作者:
徐楠（1982-），中国计量科学研究院副研究员，研究方向：低温辐射计与光纤光学计量，邮箱：xunan@nim.ac.cn

计量
- 文章访问数: 553
- HTML全文浏览量: 285
- PDF下载量: 40
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 网络出版日期: 2021-05-08

Research on Measurement of the Effective Area of Apertures Based on a Laser Scanning Method

摘要

摘要: 光阑作为限制光束通光面积的常用器件，在光学与光辐射测量中具有广泛的应用。如何准确地测量光阑面积，世界各国计量机构进行了大量的研究。本文首先介绍了激光二维扫描方法，建立了光阑有效通光面积的测量装置，利用此装置测量了一个直径为8 mm的光阑的有效通光面积。本文对有效面积测量的各项不确定度分量进行了分析，包括激光功率稳定性、光阑边缘附近的信号波动，以及积分球散斑和内壁均匀性等。实验表明光阑有效面积测量结果的相对扩展不确定度达到1.8×10⁻⁴（k=2）。
- 光阑有效面积 /
- 辐照度 /
- 激光扫描法 /
- 计量学 /
- 测量不确定度
Abstract: As a common device to limit the passing-through area of a light beam, apertures are widely used in optics and optical radiation measurement. In order to precisely measure the aperture area, metrology institutes around the world have done a lot of research. In this paper, an effective-aperture-area measurement facility based on a two-dimensional scanning method is established and the area of a circular aperture with a diameter of 8 mm is measured using the facility. The factors affecting the area measurement are analyzed, including the stability of the laser power, the signal fluctuation near the edge of the aperture, the speckle of the integrating sphere, and the uniformity of the inner wall. The experimental results showed that the relative extended uncertainty of the measured effective aperture area was 1.8×10⁻⁴ (k=2).
- effective aperture area /
- irradiance /
- laser scanning /
- metrology /
- measurement uncertainty

HTML全文

图 1 有效通光面积法基本原理图

Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the effective area method

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 采用激光扫描方式的原理图

Figure 2. Schematic diagram of the laser scanning method

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 测量装置光路图

Figure 3. Schematic of the measuring device

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 完整时间稳定性

Figure 4. Total time stability

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 光阑扫描信号的三维分布图

Figure 5. Three-dimensional distribution of the scanning signal

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 探测器接收功率各点重复性

Figure 6. Repeatability of the measurements

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 光阑面积测量结果对比

Figure 7. Comparison of measurement results of the aperture area

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 比对结果

Table 1. Results of the comparison

机构	5 mm铜制光阑		5 mm铝青铜制光阑
机构	相对误差	相对不确定度	相对误差	相对不确定度
PTB	0.0326%	0.0127%	0.5144%	0.0750%
NPL	0.0087%	0.0107%	0.1465%	0.0168%
MIKES	0.0148%	0.0382%	−0.0387%	0.0391%
BIPM	0.0171%	0.0108%	0.0073%	0.0147%
NIST	0.0254%	0.0105%	0.0086%	0.0139%

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 相对不确定度分析

Table 2. Uncertainty analysis

不确定度分量	不确定度贡献（×10⁻⁵）
x-y位移台定位准确度	1.2
待测光阑倾斜	1.4
扫描步长大小	1.5
光阑边缘的影响	5.0
积分球均匀性	2.0
温度效应	0.9
杂散光	1.0
重复性	6.6
合成标准不确定度	8.9
扩展不确定度（k=2）	18

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(16)

[1]	赵文贤, 李新, 张艳娜. 不同光阑面积比值高精度测量方法[J]. 大气与环境光学学报, 2018, 72(3): 70-76.
[2]	王馨梓. 固定发射率辐射温度计校准中的温度修正分析[J]. 计量技术, 2017(10): 40-43. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0771.2017.10.13
[3]	陈祥子, 方伟, 杨振岭, 等. 太阳辐照绝对辐射计主光阑面积测量[J]. 光学学报, 2015, 35(9): 153-158.
[4]	Lassila A, Toivanen P, Ikonen E. An optic-al method for direct determination of the radiome-tric aperture area at high accuracy[J]. Measurement ence & Technology, 1997, 8(9): 973.
[5]	Goodman T M, Key P J. The NPL radiometric realization of the candela[J]. Metrologia, 1988, 25(1): 29-40. doi: 10.1088/0026-1394/25/1/006
[6]	Ikonen E, Toivanen P, Lassila A. A new optical method for high-accuracy determination of aperture area[J]. Metrologia, 1998, 35(4): 369-372. doi: 10.1088/0026-1394/35/4/25
[7]	Neugebauer M. The uncertainty of diameter calibrations with the comparator for diameter and form[J]. Meas Sci Technol, 1998, 9(7): 1053-1058. doi: 10.1088/0957-0233/9/7/008
[8]	Litorja M, Fowler J. Report on the CCPR-S2 Supplementary Comparison of Area Measurements of Apertures for Radiometry[M]. National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2007.
[9]	Litorja M, Johnson B C, Fowler J. Area measurements of apertures for exoatmospheric solar irradiance for JPL[J]. Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering, 2007, 6677: 667708.
[10]	Fowler J, Durvasula R S, Parr A C. High accuracy aperture-area measurement facilities at the National Institute of Standards and Technology[J]. Metrologia, 1998(35): 497-500.
[11]	Joel, Fowler, Maritoni, et al. Geometric area measurements of circular apertures for radiometry at NIST[J]. Metrologia, 2003, 40(1): 9-12. doi: 10.1088/0026-1394/40/1/303
[12]	Lassila A, Toivanen P, Ikonen E. An optical method for direct determination of the radiometric aperture area at high accuracy[J]. Measurement Science & Technology, 1997, 8(9): 973.
[13]	US Department of Commerce. Report on the CCPR-S2 Supplementary Comparison of Area Measurements of Apertures of Radiometry[J]. Metrologia, 2007(44): 02002.
[14]	Timo Dönsberg, Henrik Mäntynen. Optical aperture area determination for accurate illuminance and luminous efficacy measurements of LED lamps[J]. Optical Review, 2016, 23(3): 510-521. doi: 10.1007/s10043-016-0181-2
[15]	Brown S W, Eppeldauer G P, Lykke K R. Facility for spectral irradiance and radiance responsivity calibrations using uniform sources[J]. Applied Optics, 2006, 45(32): 8218-37. doi: 10.1364/AO.45.008218
[16]	徐秋云, 李雅男, 翟文超, 等. 激光散斑去除效果定量分析[J]. 光电工程, 2010, 37(5): 32-36. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-501X.2010.05.006