细胞密度对抗癌药药效评估准确性的研究

薛志超; 赵佳威; 李永淑; 曾嘉明; 龚晓云

doi:10.12338/j.issn.2096-9015.2022.0272

细胞密度对抗癌药药效评估准确性的研究

doi: 10.12338/j.issn.2096-9015.2022.0272

1.
中国计量科学研究院，北京 100029
2.
中国计量大学，杭州 322002
3.
深圳中国计量科学研究院技术创新研究院，深圳 518107

基金项目: 中国计量科学研究院基本科研业务费项目（AKYZZ2224）。

详细信息

作者简介:
薛志超（1988-），中国计量科学研究院博士后，研究方向：细胞计量、蛋白质组研究等，邮箱：xuezc@nim.ac.cn

通讯作者:
龚晓云（1988-），中国计量科学研究院副研究员，研究方向：细胞计量、质谱技术等，邮箱：gxy@nim.ac.cn

中图分类号: TB99
计量
- 文章访问数: 465
- HTML全文浏览量: 205
- PDF下载量: 34
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2022-11-16
- 录用日期: 2022-12-08
- 修回日期: 2023-04-07
- 网络出版日期: 2023-04-18
- 刊出日期: 2023-04-18

Impact of Cell Density on the Accuracy of Anticancer Drug Efficacy Evaluation

1.
National Institute of Metrology, Beijing 100029, China
2.
China Jiliang University, Hangzhou 322002, China
3.
Shenzhen Institute for Technology Innovation, National Institute of Metrology, Shenzhen 518055, China

摘要

摘要: 使用贴壁细胞进行试验时，细胞接种密度的大小直接关系到细胞贴壁后的密度，是影响后续生物学实验准确性的关键因素。将贴壁Hela细胞系作为研究对象，使用体外实验中常用的3000个细胞/孔和4000个细胞/孔两个密度对细胞进行接种，对比两组细胞接种密度的接种后面积差异、接种后生长速率差异以及对传统化疗药与新型靶向药的药物实验结果差异。结果显示，接种密度为3000个细胞/孔和4000个细胞/孔，两组细胞占每孔底面积有显著统计学差异（P < 0.05）；4000个细胞/孔时细胞生长速率高于3000个细胞/孔。在使用传统化疗药顺铂时，接种密度为3000个细胞/孔及4000个细胞/孔时，第1天、第3天、第5天的药物抑制率无差异，但在使用细胞周期抑制剂帕博西尼时，第1天、第3天、第5天的药物抑制率均有显著差异。因此，细胞的起始接种密度对部分特殊药物的评估存在重要影响。
- 计量学 /
- 细胞计量 /
- 细胞密度 /
- 生长速率 /
- 药物抑制率 /
- 抗癌药物
Abstract: The seeding density of cells, which directly influences the resultant adherent cell density, is a crucial factor affecting the accuracy of subsequent biological experiments. In this study, Hela cell line was used as a model, with two commonly used seeding densities in in vitro experiments: 3000 cells/well and 4000 cells/well. Differences in post-seeding coverage area, growth rates, and the outcomes of drug experiments with traditional chemotherapy and novel targeted therapeutics were compared between these two seeding densities. Significant statistical differences were observed in coverage area between the two groups (P < 0.05). Furthermore, the growth rate at 4000 cells/well was found to be higher than at 3000 cells/well. During the use of the conventional chemotherapy drug, Cisplatin, there was no significant difference in drug inhibition rates between the two cell densities at days 1, 3, and 5. However, when the cell cycle inhibitor Palbociclib was used, significant differences in drug inhibition rates were observed on days 1, 3, and 5. Therefore, the initial seeding density of cells can significantly impact the evaluation of some specific drugs.
- metrology /
- cell measurement /
- cell density /
- growth rate /
- drug inhibition rate /
- anticancer drugs

HTML全文

图 1 细胞底面积差异3000或4000细胞/孔时显微镜下照片

Figure 1. Microscopic images showing differences in cell confluence at 3000 or 4000 cells/well

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 软件计算细胞占底面积比例

Figure 2. Calculation of cell coverage area percentage using software

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 细胞生长差异

Figure 3. Difference in cell growth

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 细胞密度差异对不同药物药效的影响

Figure 4. Impact of cell density differences on the efficacy evaluation of various drugs

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 细胞密度对化疗药药效的影响

Figure 5. Impact of cell density on the efficacy of chemotherapy drugs

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 细胞密度对靶向药药效的影响

Figure 6. Impact of cell density on the efficacy of targeted drugs

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

参考文献(30)

[1]	Wilding J. L, Bodmer. Cancer cell lines for drug discovery and development[J]. Cancer research:The official organ of the American Association for Cancer Research, Inc, 2014, 74(9): 2377-2384.
[2]	刘佳敏, 贾晓青, 狄斌. 三维细胞模型在肿瘤研究中的应用[J]. 中国药科大学学报, 2020, 51(2): 152-160.
[3]	余利星, 翟睿, 龚晓云, 等. 基于磁性纳米材料分离的肿瘤标志物HSP90α质谱分析方法[J]. 计量技术, 2020(5): 14-18,78.
[4]	Faruqui N, Kummrow A, Fu B, et al. Cellular Metrology: Scoping for a Value Proposition in Extra- and Intracellular Measurements[J]. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 2019, 7: 456.
[5]	Wong C H, Siah K W, Lo A W. Estimation of clinical trial success rates and related parameters[J]. Biostatistics, 2019, 20(2): 273-286. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxx069
[6]	吴雪, 薄梦, 孙晓璟, 等. 液相色谱-质谱法检测甲磺酸沙非胺中基因毒性杂质[J]. 计量科学与技术, 2022, 66(11): 27-30. doi: 10.12338/j.issn.2096-9015.2021.0632
[7]	谭思源, 李曼莉, 傅博强, 等. 单细胞质谱分析方法研究进展[J]. 计量科学与技术, 2021, 65(5): 20-29,13. doi: 10.12338/j.issn.2096-9015.2020.9021
[8]	汤逸飞, 屠雨晨, 黄芳, 等. 基于QuEChERS-气相色谱三重四级杆串联质谱内标法测定结球甘蓝中30种农药残留的不确定度评定[J]. 计量科学与技术, 2022, 66(2): 25-32,8.
[9]	李晶晶, 罗明志, 杨莹, 等. 三种细胞计数法的对比试验研究[J]. 江西科技师范大学学报, 2016(6): 79-81. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-3558.2016.06.012
[10]	Iloki A. Cell growth curves for different cell lines and their relationship with biological activities[J]. International Journal of Biotechnology & Molecular Biology Research, 2013, 4(4): 60-70.
[11]	Mirabelli, Coppola, Salvatore. Cancer Cell Lines Are Useful Model Systems for Medical Research[J]. Cancers, 2019, 11(8): 1098. doi: 10.3390/cancers11081098
[12]	Bitar, M. , R. A. Brown, V. Salih, et al. , Effect of Cell Density on Osteoblastic Differentiation and Matrix Degradation of Biomimetic Dense Collagen Scaffolds. Biomacromolecules, 2008. 9(1): 129-135.
[13]	Abe M, Havre P A, Urasaki Y, et al. Mechanisms of confluence-dependent expression of CD26 in colon cancer cell lines[J]. BMC Cancer, 2011, 11: 51. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-11-51
[14]	Amoozadeh Y, Anwer S, Dan Q, et al. Cell confluence regulates claudin-2 expression: possible role for ZO-1 and Rac[J]. American Journal of Physiology Cell Physiology, 2018, 314(3): C366-C378. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00234.2017
[15]	Poumay Y, Pittelkow M R. Cell density and culture factors regulate keratinocyte commitment to differentiation and expression of suprabasal K1/K10 keratins.[J]. Journal of Investigative Dermatology, 1995, 104(2): 271-276. doi: 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12612810
[16]	Nusinow D P, Szpyt J, Ghandi M, et al. Quantitative Proteomics of the Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia[J]. Cell, 2020, 180(2): 387-402. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.12.023
[17]	Garnett M. J, E. J. Edelman, S. J. Heidorn, et al, Systematic identification of genomic markers of drug sensitivity in cancer cells[J]. Nature, 2012, 483(7391): 570-575. doi: 10.1038/nature11005
[18]	Araujo R P, Liotta L A, Petricoin E F. Proteins, drug targets and the mechanisms they control: the simple truth about complex networks.[J]. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 2007, 6(11): 871-880. doi: 10.1038/nrd2381
[19]	Kobayashi H, Ohnuma T T. Relationship between tumor cell density and drug concentration and the cytotoxic effects of doxorubicin or vincristine: mechanism of inoculum effects[J]. Cancer Chemotherapy& Pharmacology, 1992, 31(1): 6-10.
[20]	Greene J M, Levy D, Herrada S P, et al. Mathematical modeling reveals that changes to local cell density dynamically modulate baseline variations in cell growth and drug response[J]. Cancer Research, 2016, 76(10): 2882-2890. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-15-3232
[21]	Bena C E, MD Giudice, Grob A, et al. Initial cell density encodes proliferative potential in cancer cell populations[J]. Scientific Reports, 2021, 11(1): 6101. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-85406-z
[22]	Berre M L, Gerlach J Q, Dziembaa I, et al. Calculating Half Maximal Inhibitory Concentration[J]. Methods Mol Biol, 2022, 2460: 89-111.
[23]	Lorusso D, Petrelli F, Coinu A, et al. A systematic review comparing cisplatin and carboplatin plus paclitaxel-based chemotherapy for recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer[J]. Gynecologic Oncology, 2014, 133(1): 117-123. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.01.042
[24]	Florea A M, Büsselberg, Dietrich. Cisplatin as an Anti-Tumor Drug: Cellular Mechanisms of Activity, Drug Resistance and Induced Side Effects[J]. Cancers, 2011, 3(1): 1351-1371. doi: 10.3390/cancers3011351
[25]	韦棋, 苏福海. GC-MS和LC-MS/MS法测定毛发中的6种苯丙胺类药物[J]. 计量科学与技术, 2022, 66(4): 48-54.
[26]	胡和平. 血细胞分析仪的工作原理及血细胞分类计数[J]. 计量与测试技术, 2012, 39(5): 4,6. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-6941.2012.05.002
[27]	陈桂芳, 欧阳艳艳, 杨佳怡, 等. 核酸标准物质测量方法研究进展[J]. 计量科学与技术, 2021, 65(6): 25-33. doi: 10.12338/j.issn.2096-9015.2020.9022
[28]	易可可, 谢洁, 江游, 等. 液相色谱-串联质谱技术在临床检验中的应用研究进展[J]. 质谱学报, 2022, 43(6): 804-816. doi: 10.7538/zpxb.2021.0146
[29]	易可可, 谢洁, 龚晓云, 等. 液相色谱-串联质谱应用研究进展[J]. 计量科学与技术, 2021(2): 7-15,6.
[30]	薛志超, 曾嘉明, 李永淑, 等. 接种数量对细胞生长和药物作用的影响及细胞计数方法对比[J]. 计量学报, 2023(3): 1-9.