Analysis on Influencing Factors of Indication Error of Fuel Dispensers

MA Jun; LIAO Hongyi; CAO Xianke; YANG Chao

doi:10.12338/j.issn.2096-9015.2020.0316

Volume 66 Issue 8

Sep. 2022

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Metrology Science and Technology > 2022 > 66(8): 67-71, 56

MA Jun, LIAO Hongyi, CAO Xianke, YANG Chao. Analysis on Influencing Factors of Indication Error of Fuel Dispensers[J]. Metrology Science and Technology, 2022, 66(8): 67-71, 56. doi: 10.12338/j.issn.2096-9015.2020.0316

Citation:

MA Jun, LIAO Hongyi, CAO Xianke, YANG Chao. Analysis on Influencing Factors of Indication Error of Fuel Dispensers[J]. Metrology Science and Technology, 2022, 66(8): 67-71, 56. doi: 10.12338/j.issn.2096-9015.2020.0316

Citation:

PDF( 1132 KB)

Analysis on Influencing Factors of Indication Error of Fuel Dispensers

doi: 10.12338/j.issn.2096-9015.2020.0316

Haidian Institute of Metrology, Beijing 100083, China

Available Online: 2022-06-20
Publish Date: 2022-09-15

Abstract

Abstract

The influencing factors of the indication error of fuel dispensers mainly come from the ambient temperature, flow rate of, standard metal gauge, and vapor recovery system. In this paper, the influence of such factors on the error of indication value of fuel dispensers are analyzed through multiple groups of comparative experiments. The results showed that the verification value of standard metal gauge is lower than the actual measurement when the gasoline temperature is lower than the ambient temperature in summer. However, the verification value of standard metal gauge is higher than the actual measurement in winter. Under the same verification conditions, the fuel nozzle has a larger indication error when refueling with a large flow than with a small flow. Different structural features of standard metal gauges will cause different degrees of volatilization of oil and gas, resulting in different indication errors when other conditions are the same. Activating the vapor recovery device will reduce the actual oil output of the fuel dispenser, and the larger the gas-liquid ratio, the larger the indication error will be.
- fuel dispensers,
- temperature,
- flow,
- standard metal gauge,
- vapor recovery,
- error value

FullText(HTML)

References(15)

References

[1]	杨静. 燃油加油机基础知识[J]. 中国计量, 2018(2): 126-128.
[2]	赵琳杰. 燃油加油机检定准确度影响因素及控制方法分析[J]. 技术与市场, 2019, 26(6): 127,129.
[3]	林兴涛. 关于燃油加油机计量检定过程中测量误差问题的探讨[J]. 中国石油和化工标准与质量, 2019, 39(8): 37-38. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-4076.2019.08.018
[4]	郑建俊. 加油机计量误差减小措施的探究[J]. 中国标准化, 2017(16): 75-76. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-5944.2017.16.050
[5]	徐维. 标准加油机计量检定中温度对测量误差的影响及减少温度误差的方法[J]. 中国标准化, 2017(12): 58-62. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-5944.2017.12.046
[6]	刘子勇, 张一立, 孔庆彦, 等. 标准金属量器检定规程: JJG 259-2005[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2005.
[7]	高磊. 探讨影响燃油加油机检定准确度的因素及措施[J]. 内燃机与配件, 2018(8): 155-156. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-957X.2018.08.083
[8]	杨静, 吴伟龙, 张进明, 等. 燃油加油机检定规程: JJG 443-2015[S]. 北京: 中国质检出版社, 2015.
[9]	曹宪科, 廖弘毅, 马俊. 油气挥发对燃油加油机检测的影响[J]. 中国计量, 2021(4): 129-131. doi: 10.16569/j.cnki.cn11-3720/t.2021.04.048
[10]	杨经荣, 黎玲. 油气回收系统对加油机示值误差的影响[J]. 计量技术, 2007(9): 54-55,73.
[11]	李玉石. 浅谈加油机油气回收系统原理[J]. 计量与测试技术, 2014(8): 36-39. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-6941.2014.08.020
[12]	王开平. 基于层次分析法的油罐车回收装置密闭性评价[J]. 计量科学与技术, 2020(9): 21-26. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0771.2020.09.05
[13]	张进明, 李海洋, 朱碧玉, 等. 油气回收装置对燃油加油机计量性能的影响[J]. 上海计量测试, 2018, 45(2): 5-8. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-2235.2018.02.004
[14]	林建辉. 二阶段油气回收对燃油加油机示值误差的影响及原因分析[J]. 计量技术, 2016(8): 71-73.
[15]	连鹏翔. 油气回收系统故障引发的加油机计量失准解析[J]. 中国计量, 2019(3): 129-130. doi: 10.16569/j.cnki.cn11-3720/t.2019.03.031