Research on Calibration Method of New Air Sampler and Uncertainty Evaluation

WANG Lei; GAO Feng; MENG Tao; ZHANG Yinan; QIU Xueling

doi:10.12338/j.issn.2096-9015.2020.9005

Volume 65 Issue 8

Aug. 2021

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Metrology Science and Technology > 2021 > 65(8): 46-50, 45

WANG Lei, GAO Feng, MENG Tao, ZHANG Yinan, QIU Xueling. Research on Calibration Method of New Air Sampler and Uncertainty Evaluation[J]. Metrology Science and Technology, 2021, 65(8): 46-50, 45. doi: 10.12338/j.issn.2096-9015.2020.9005

Citation:

WANG Lei, GAO Feng, MENG Tao, ZHANG Yinan, QIU Xueling. Research on Calibration Method of New Air Sampler and Uncertainty Evaluation[J]. Metrology Science and Technology, 2021, 65(8): 46-50, 45. doi: 10.12338/j.issn.2096-9015.2020.9005

Citation:

PDF( 698 KB)

Research on Calibration Method of New Air Sampler and Uncertainty Evaluation

doi: 10.12338/j.issn.2096-9015.2020.9005

1.
National Institute of Metrology, Beijing 100029, China
2.
Nanjing Institute of Measurement and Testing Technology, Nanjing 210049
3.
Jiangxi Institute of Metrology & Testing, Nanchang 330002

Available Online: 2021-04-21
Publish Date: 2021-08-01

Abstract

Abstract

Air sampler is an important measuring instrument for environmental monitoring. With the rapid development of environmental protection industry, the direct-reading air sampler has been widely used.The current verification regulation JJG 956 "Air sampler" is only applicable when the standard apparatus is soap film flowmeter, whereas it is not applicable to the air sampler whose meter is a rotameter or the flow direct-reading type air sampler. Meanwhile, the corresponding standard meters are also developing rapidly and more results showed that the laminar differential pressure mass flowmeter has more advantages than the soap film flowmeter in the regulation. It can not only improve calibration efficiency, but also realize automatic calibration or even remote calibration. In this paper, the laminar flow differential pressure mass flowmeter calibration method of flow direct-reading type of air sampler was studied. The mathematical model of flow rate and relative indication error used in the calibration condition was proposed, and the uncertainty of indication error was also analyzed in detail. In addition, the evaluation example was given to prove the feasibility of the method of calibration of direct-reading type of air sampler.
- air sampler,
- calibration,
- calculation of relative indication error,
- uncertainty of indication error,
- laminar flow differential pressure mass flowmeter

FullText(HTML)

References(12)

References

[1]	国家质量监督检验检疫总局. 大气采样器检定规程: JJG 956-2013[S]. 北京: 中国质检出版社, 2013.
[2]	徐英华, 沈文新, 崔骊水. 浮子流量计[M]. 北京: 中国计量出版社, 2009: 46-49.
[3]	王文, 何振环, 张红杰. 常见气体监测类采样器计量方法分析与研究[J]. 中国检验检测, 2020(2): 36-37.
[4]	魏少群, 刘慧平, 黄志凡, 等. 基于层流流量计的多组分气体流量测量与补偿算法研究[J]. 计量与测试技术, 2017, 44(5): 114-116.
[5]	国家质量监督检验检疫总局. 标准表法流量标准装置检定规程: JJG 643-2003[S]. 北京: 中国质检出版社, 2003.
[6]	苏彦勋, 梁国伟, 盛健. 流量计量与测试[M]. 北京: 中国计量出版社, 2007: 323-330.
[7]	国家质量监督检验检疫总局. 浮子流量计检定规程: JJG 257-2007[S]. 北京: 中国质检出版社, 2007.
[8]	国家质量监督检验检疫总局. 测量不确定度评定与表示: JJF 1059-2012[S]. 北京: 中国计量出版社, 2012.
[9]	Steinbock J, Weissenbrunner A, Juling M, et al. Uncertainty evaluation for velocity–area methods[J]. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 2016, 48: 51-56. doi: 10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2015.09.007
[10]	Almeida F C D, Oliveira E C D, Barbosa C R H. Design of experiments to analyze the influence of water content and meter factor on the uncertainty of oil flow measurement with ultrasonic meters[J]. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 2019, 70: 1016-1027.
[11]	王池. 流量测量不确定度分析[M]. 北京: 中国计量出版社, 2002: 15-17.
[12]	Choi H M, Park K A, Oh Y K, et al. Uncertainty evaluation procedure and intercomparison of bell provers as a calibration system for gas flow meters[J]. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 2010, 21(4): 488-496. doi: 10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2010.07.002