Study on Performance and Supervision of Smart Meters

LI Jinsi; LI Haitao; ZHOU Wenbin; LIU Shifeng

doi:10.12338/j.issn.2096-9015.2021.0243

Volume 66 Issue 3

Mar. 2022

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Metrology Science and Technology > 2022 > 66(3): 70-75

LI Jinsi, LI Haitao, ZHOU Wenbin, LIU Shifeng. Study on Performance and Supervision of Smart Meters[J]. Metrology Science and Technology, 2022, 66(3): 70-75. doi: 10.12338/j.issn.2096-9015.2021.0243

Citation:

LI Jinsi, LI Haitao, ZHOU Wenbin, LIU Shifeng. Study on Performance and Supervision of Smart Meters[J]. Metrology Science and Technology, 2022, 66(3): 70-75. doi: 10.12338/j.issn.2096-9015.2021.0243

LI Jinsi, LI Haitao, ZHOU Wenbin, LIU Shifeng. Study on Performance and Supervision of Smart Meters[J]. Metrology Science and Technology, 2022, 66(3): 70-75. doi: 10.12338/j.issn.2096-9015.2021.0243

Citation:

PDF( 1720 KB)

Study on Performance and Supervision of Smart Meters

doi: 10.12338/j.issn.2096-9015.2021.0243

1.
Beijing Institute of Metrology , Beijing 100029, China
2.
State Grid Beijing Electric Power Research Institute, Beijing 100162, China

Available Online: 2022-01-27
Publish Date: 2022-03-08

Abstract

Abstract

Combined with the manufacturing characteristics of smart meters, an appropriate big data analysis model was established based on the factory verification data, primary verification data, random sampling re-verification data, and re-verification data after eight years of continuous operation, and the distribution of the corresponding data was shown in the form of a diagram. Based on the above big data, the identification procedures of high-risk meters and medium-risk meters were established, and on-site calibration and screening of meters were carried out according to the identification results and corresponding technical specifications. The results of continuous tracking and risk control measures supported the implementation of the policy of extending the replacement cycle from 8 years to 12 or even 16 years, which supported the deepening of energy-saving and carbon-reduction work and boosted the construction of a conservation-oriented society.

FullText(HTML)

References(15)

References

[1]	杨利民, 李金嗣, 郭云峰, 等. 以风险监测为抓手提高计量监管有效性[J]. 中国计量, 2014(5): 34-38.
[2]	李金嗣, 郭云峰, 王芳, 等. 电能表计量性能的跟踪研究[J]. 中国计量, 2016(11): 68-72.
[3]	国家发展和改革委员会. 交流电能表现场测试仪: DL/T 826-2002[S]. 北京: 中国电力出版社, 2002.
[4]	国家能源局. 电子式交流电能表现场检验规程: DL/T 1478-2015[S]. 北京: 中国电力出版社, 2015.
[5]	国家能源局. 电能计量装置技术管理规程: DL/T 488-2016[S]. 北京: 中国电力出版社, 2016.
[6]	国家质量监督检验检疫总局. 电子式交流电能表: JJG 596—2012[S]. 北京: 中国计量出版社, 2012.
[7]	北京市质量技术监督局. 智能电表现场校验规范: JJF(京)51-2017[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2017.
[8]	北京市市场监督管理局. 智能电能表检定周期调整实施规范(试行): JJF(京)71-2019[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2019.
[9]	王锐, 杨帆, 袁静, 等. 基于威布尔分布和极大似然法的智能电能表寿命预测方法研究[J]. 计量学报, 2019, 40(S1): 125-129.
[10]	卫程, 窦瑞军. 全自动“四线一库”一体化校验模式的研究与应用[J]. 计量技术, 2018(10): 62-64.
[11]	谢鑫, 王黎敏, 张红雨, 等. 智能电表可靠性预计标准对比研究[J]. 计量学报, 2019, 40(S1): 60-63.
[12]	苏慧玲, 王忠东, 蔡奇新, 等. 智能电能表自动化检定的省级协同调度探讨[J]. 计量技术, 2018(8): 40-43,46.
[13]	吴建忠, 王睿, 周旻, 等. 发电厂四象限无功正确的组合方法[J]. 计量技术, 2018(7): 26-29.
[14]	国家质量监督检验检疫总局. 用能单位能源计量器具配备和管理通则: GB 17167-2006[S]. 北京: 中国计量出版社, 2006.
[15]	张友顺, 冯井岗. 电能计量基础 [M]. 第二版. 北京: 中国计量出版社, 2002.