Discussion on the Processing of the Ion Activity Coefficient in the Uncertainty Evaluation of pX Measurement Errors

XIU Hongyu; HE Xinyang

doi:10.12338/j.issn.2096-9015.2021.0276

Volume 66 Issue 9

Sep. 2022

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Metrology Science and Technology > 2022 > 66(9): 28-32

XIU Hongyu, HE Xinyang. Discussion on the Processing of the Ion Activity Coefficient in the Uncertainty Evaluation of pX Measurement Errors[J]. Metrology Science and Technology, 2022, 66(9): 28-32. doi: 10.12338/j.issn.2096-9015.2021.0276

Citation:

XIU Hongyu, HE Xinyang. Discussion on the Processing of the Ion Activity Coefficient in the Uncertainty Evaluation of pX Measurement Errors[J]. Metrology Science and Technology, 2022, 66(9): 28-32. doi: 10.12338/j.issn.2096-9015.2021.0276

Citation:

PDF( 610 KB)

Discussion on the Processing of the Ion Activity Coefficient in the Uncertainty Evaluation of pX Measurement Errors

doi: 10.12338/j.issn.2096-9015.2021.0276

National Institute of Metrology, Beijing 100029, China

Available Online: 2022-09-15
Publish Date: 2022-09-30

Abstract

Abstract

pX measurement is usually carried out by laboratory ion meter based on the principle of electrochemical analysis, and the working curve needs to be calibrated with a standard solution before measurement. Since the prepared value of the standard solution for calibration is the concentration value and the instrument response quantity is the activity value, and activity and concentration are two different quantities, the unmeasurable and difference of the activity coefficient make the pX measurement have a large measurement error. In this paper, a processing method of the activity coefficient in the uncertainty assessment of the pX measurement error is discussed, taking the data of one experiment as an example.
- laboratory ion meter,
- pX measurement error,
- uncertainty evaluation,
- activity coefficient

FullText(HTML)

References(16)

References

[1]	朱坚民, 郭冰菁, 宾鸿赞, 等. 专家智能pNa测试系统[J]. 计量学报, 2000, 21(1): 68-73. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-1158.2000.01.012
[2]	韦秋叶, 磨昕玥. 离子选择电极法氯离子含量测定仪的校准方法[J]. 计量技术, 2020(3): 39-41.
[3]	肖克, 任昀, 朱翔, 等. 基于离子选择性电极法的氟化物水质分析仪校准方法研究[J]. 计量技术, 2018(3): 41-43.
[4]	李俊. 钠离子计测量准确度的影响因素分析与对策[J]. 计量技术, 2016(5): 40-42.
[5]	袁礼, 谢琪, 邵志新, 等. 实验室离子计: JJG 757-2018[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2019.
[6]	傅献彩, 沈文霞, 姚天扬. 物理化学[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 1995: 263-265.
[7]	赵彤, 姜云祥, 杜荷聪. 国际单位制及其应用: GB 3100-1993 [S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 1994.
[8]	Chris C Rundle BSc. A Beginners Guide to Ion-Selective Electrode Measurements[EB/OL]. (2017-10-14)[2022-09-14]. http://www.nico2000.net/Book/Guide1.html.
[9]	丁京安, 黄坚, 李勇, 等. 电子天平: JJG 1036-2008[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2005.
[10]	杜书利, 张志清, 谢军燕, 等. 常用玻璃量器: JJG 196-2006[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2007.
[11]	叶德培, 赵峰, 施昌彦, 等. 测量不确定度评定与表示: JJF 1059.1-2012[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2013.
[12]	刘世念, 叶桂珍. 钠离子计电计示值误差和仪器示值总误差的测量不确定度[J]. 工业计量, 2005(3): 39-41. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-1183.2005.03.016
[13]	黄超伦, 栗瑞芬, 修荣. 氟离子选择电极法测定药物中的氟喹诺酮[J]. 分析化学, 2004(3): 364-365. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-3820.2004.03.023
[14]	谢学和. 离子选择电极法测定氟离子的影响因素[J]. 化工设计通讯, 2020(9): 184-185. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-6490.2020.09.098
[15]	郜守一, 邵传东, 张彥军, 等. 离子选择电极法测定氟离子方法的优化[J]. 化工设计通讯, 2021(3): 63,70. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-6490.2021.03.032
[16]	尹台芳, 李多容, 宗杰. 离子选择电极法测定镁粉中氯离子[J]. 治金分析, 2017(10): 70-73.