Volume 66 Issue 5
Jul.  2022
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
ZHAO Rui, WU Jinjie, WEN Yuqin, SONG Fei, HAN Lu, YAN Yongqiang, LV Yazhu. Comparison of Air Kerma Values of X-Ray at 60 ~ 250 kV Therapeutic Level in China[J]. Metrology Science and Technology, 2022, 66(5): 55-60. doi: 10.12338/j.issn.2096-9015.2021.0585
Citation: ZHAO Rui, WU Jinjie, WEN Yuqin, SONG Fei, HAN Lu, YAN Yongqiang, LV Yazhu. Comparison of Air Kerma Values of X-Ray at 60 ~ 250 kV Therapeutic Level in China[J]. Metrology Science and Technology, 2022, 66(5): 55-60. doi: 10.12338/j.issn.2096-9015.2021.0585

Comparison of Air Kerma Values of X-Ray at 60 ~ 250 kV Therapeutic Level in China

doi: 10.12338/j.issn.2096-9015.2021.0585
  • Available Online: 2022-04-11
  • Publish Date: 2022-07-11
  • Radiotherapy level ionization chamber dosimeter is the main measuring instrument for radiotherapy in hospitals, and it is also the national compulsory verification measuring instrument. The accuracy of its dose measurement is the key carrying out precision radiotherapy. To ensure the accuracy and unity of the quantity value, from 2019 to 2020, National Institute of metrology, China, as the leading laboratory, organized the national comparison of the 60 ~ 250 kV X-ray air kerma. A total of 11 laboratories participated in the comparison, and all reference laboratories established 60 kV, 100 kV, 135 kV, 180 kV, and 250 kV reference radiation. The calibration factor and measurement uncertainty under different radiation were obtained by calibrating two transfer standard ionization chambers in the radiation field using the petal comparison method. The comparison results show that the normalized deviation of each reference laboratory is less than 1, and the comparison results are satisfactory.
  • loading
  • [1]
    Ferlay J, Colombet M, Soerjomataram I, et al. Cancer statistics for the year 2020: an overview[J]. International Journal of Cancer, 2021, 149(4): 778-789. doi: 10.1002/ijc.33588
    [2]
    吴金杰, 杨元第, 吕雅竹. 治疗水平电离室剂量计X射线能量响应的研究[J]. 核电子学与探测技术, 2012, 32(6): 675-677. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-0934.2012.06.013
    [3]
    樊松, 吴金杰, 王坤, 等. 中能X射线水吸收剂量量值复现方法研究[J]. 计量学报, 2018, 39(6A): 148-152.
    [4]
    国家质量监督检验检疫总局. 计量比对: JJF 1117-2010[S]. 北京: 中国质检出版社, 2010.
    [5]
    International Electrotechnical Commission. Medical electrical equipment – Dosimeters with ionization chambers as used in radiotherapy: IEC 60731 [S]. Genève: IEC, 2016.
    [6]
    全国电离辐射计量技术委员会. 60~250 kV X射线空气比释动能计量器具检定系统表: JJG 2043-2010[S]. 北京: 中国质检出版社, 2010.
    [7]
    全国电离辐射计量技术委员会. 治疗水平电离室剂量计检定规程: JJG 912-2010[S]. 北京: 中国质检出版社, 2010.
    [8]
    全国法制计量管理计量技术委员会. 测量不确定度评定与表示: JJF1059.1-2012[S]. 北京: 中国质检出版社, 2013.
    [9]
    周振杰, 吴金杰, 葛双, 等. 治疗水平X射线辐射质的建立[J]. 核电子学与探测技术, 2016, 36(2): 166-170. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-0934.2016.02.012
    [10]
    王家伟, 魏鹏, 马伯轩, 等. 诊断X射线检测设备半值层测量结果的影响因素[J]. 计量科学与技术, 2021, 65(8): 3-6. doi: 10.12338/j.issn.2096-9015.2020.9038
    [11]
    张文东, 易洪, 崔体运, 等. 精密露点仪全国量值比对及结果分析[J]. 工业计量, 2019, 171(6): 72-75.
    [12]
    宋晓靓, 熊旭亚, 苏春磊, 等. 2012年γ射线空气比释动能标准能力比对[J]. 辐射防护, 2014, 34(3): 157-161.
    [13]
    虞惠霞. E n值在校准实验室中的应用[J]. 现代测量与实验室管理, 2006(5): 42-43. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8764.2006.05.016
    [14]
    黄金梅, 高旭辉, 常梅, 等. 水质浊度量值比对及结果分析[J]. 计量科学与技术, 2021, 65(12): 66-69. doi: 10.12338/j.issn.2096-9015.2019.0455
    [15]
    Burns D T, Kessler C, Wu J J, et al. Key comparison BIPM. RI(I)-K3 of the air-kerma standards of the NIM, China and the BIPM in medium-energy x-rays[J]. Metrologia, 2017, 54(1A): 6008-6019. doi: 10.1088/0026-1394/54/1A/06008
    [16]
    Lee J H, Hwang W S, Kotler L H, et al. APMP/TCRI key comparison report of measurement of air kerma for medium-energy x-rays (APMP. RI(I)-K3)[J]. Metrologia, 2008, 45(1A): 6012-6021. doi: 10.1088/0026-1394/45/1A/06012
    [17]
    周振杰, 吴金杰, 任世伟, 等. 中能X射线空气比释动能基准不确定度分析[J]. 计量学报, 2016, 37(z1): 99-103. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1158.2016.z1.23
    [18]
    樊松, 吴金杰, 余继利, 等. 治疗水平电离室刻度因子不确定度评定[J]. 核电子学与探测技术, 2017, 37(8): 792-796. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-0934.2017.08.008
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(3)  / Tables(12)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (52) PDF downloads(2) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return