Volume 66 Issue 10
Oct.  2022
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
WANG Hai, WANG Meiling, REN Danhua, WANG Xiangnan, SHU Hui, ZHANG Airui, SONG Xiaoping. Domestic Status Quo and Quantity Value Verification of Certified Reference Materials for Electrolytic Conductivity[J]. Metrology Science and Technology, 2022, 66(10): 16-19, 64. doi: 10.12338/j.issn.2096-9015.2022.0162
Citation: WANG Hai, WANG Meiling, REN Danhua, WANG Xiangnan, SHU Hui, ZHANG Airui, SONG Xiaoping. Domestic Status Quo and Quantity Value Verification of Certified Reference Materials for Electrolytic Conductivity[J]. Metrology Science and Technology, 2022, 66(10): 16-19, 64. doi: 10.12338/j.issn.2096-9015.2022.0162

Domestic Status Quo and Quantity Value Verification of Certified Reference Materials for Electrolytic Conductivity

doi: 10.12338/j.issn.2096-9015.2022.0162
  • Received Date: 2022-07-07
  • Accepted Date: 2022-07-11
  • Available Online: 2022-09-02
  • Publish Date: 2022-10-01
  • The certified reference materials (CRMs) for electrolytic conductivity are crucial to ensuring accurate and consistent conductivity measurement results. In this paper, the current situation of existing conductivity CRMs in China is reviewed in terms of their characterization methods and scope of application, and the characteristics of existing CRMs and their shortcomings are analyzed in depth. In view of the current situation that more than 50% of the existing conductivity CRMs in China are characterized by comparative measurement methods, the primary standard for the conductivity of electrolyte solutions was used to verify the values of these CRMs. The results of the verification show that: the accuracy and quality of the comparative measurement method for the characterization of the CRMs are poor (overall pass rate of 58%, the rate of CRMs with lower characterization values is 20%), and there is an urgent need to strengthen the market regulation in the process of replication of the reference materials. When the comparative measurement method for the characterization of the CRMs is being applied, several important technical aspects deserve attention, namely, the accuracy level of the conductivity meter used, the accurate determination of the conductivity of type II water in the laboratory, the correction of the air buoyancy when weighing the mass, the accurate fixing of the solution volume, and the scientific and reasonable assessment of the uncertainty of the characterization of the CRMs.
  • loading
  • [1]
    JUHÁSZ E, MARSH K N. Recommended reference materials for realization of physicochemical properties. Section: electrolytic conductivity[J]. Pure & Appl Chem, 1981, 53: 1841-1845.
    [2]
    全国物理化学计量技术委员会. 电导率仪检定规程: JJG 376-2007 [S]. 北京: 中国计量出版社, 2008.
    [3]
    全国化学标准化技术委员会. 分析实验室用水规格和试验方法: GB/T 6682-2016 [S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2016.
    [4]
    中国电子技术标准化研究院. 电子级水: GB/T 11446.1-2013 [S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2014.
    [5]
    国家药典委员会. 中华人民共和国药典 [M]. 北京: 中国医药科技出版社, 2020: 91-92.
    [6]
    环境保护部. 地表水自动监测技术规范: HJ 915-2017 [S]. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 2018.
    [7]
    环境保护部. 土壤 电导率的测定 电极法: HJ 802-2016 [S]. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 2016.
    [8]
    宋小平, 王海, 侯美英. 无电极电导率仪电子单元校准技术[J]. 计量技术, 2009, 53(10): 42-45.
    [9]
    宋小平, 王海, 侯美英. 无电极电导率仪电导池常数的校准[J]. 计量技术, 2010, 54(9): 44-46.
    [10]
    侯美英, 王海, 宋小平. 在线电导率仪现场校准方法的探讨[J]. 计量技术, 2017, 61(7): 53-55.
    [11]
    宋小平, 王海, 侯美英. 电导率标准溶液配置环节对量值不确定度的影响[J]. 计量技术, 2009, 53(10): 72-74.
    [12]
    International Organization of Legal Metrology. Standard solutions reproducing the conductivity of electrolytes: OIML R 56-1981 [S]. Paris: OIML, 1981.
    [13]
    PRATT K W, KOCH W F, WU Y C, et al. Molality-based primary standards of electrolytic conductivity[J]. Pure & Appl Chem, 2001, 73(11): 1783-1793.
    [14]
    Jensen H D. Final report on CCQM-K36.1 with erratum[J]. Metrologia, 2009, 46(1A): 8004. doi: 10.1088/0026-1394/46/1A/08004
    [15]
    SEITZ S, SANDER B, SNEDDEN A, et al. CCQM-K36.2016 Electrolytic Conductivity at 0.5S/m and 5mS/m[J]. Metrologia, 2017, 54(1A): 8032. doi: 10.1088/0026-1394/54/1A/08032
    [16]
    VYSKOČIL L, MÁRIÁSSY M, REYES A, et al. Report of key comparison CCQM-K92 Electrolytic conductivity at 0.05S/m and 20 S/m[J]. Metrologia, 2013, 50(1A): 8013. doi: 10.1088/0026-1394/50/1A/08013
    [17]
    全国物理化学计量技术委员会. 化学量测量比对: JJF 1117.1-2012 [S]. 北京: 中国质检出版社, 2013.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(1)  / Tables(3)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (595) PDF downloads(92) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return