An Overview of Algorithm Traceability

WANG Tingting; CUI Weiqun

doi:10.12338/j.issn.2096-9015.2022.0270

Volume 67 Issue 5

May 2023

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Metrology Science and Technology > 2023 > 67(5): 23-30

WANG Tingting, CUI Weiqun. An Overview of Algorithm Traceability[J]. Metrology Science and Technology, 2023, 67(5): 23-30. doi: 10.12338/j.issn.2096-9015.2022.0270

Citation:

WANG Tingting, CUI Weiqun. An Overview of Algorithm Traceability[J]. Metrology Science and Technology, 2023, 67(5): 23-30. doi: 10.12338/j.issn.2096-9015.2022.0270

WANG Tingting, CUI Weiqun. An Overview of Algorithm Traceability[J]. Metrology Science and Technology, 2023, 67(5): 23-30. doi: 10.12338/j.issn.2096-9015.2022.0270

Citation:

WANG Tingting, CUI Weiqun. An Overview of Algorithm Traceability[J]. Metrology Science and Technology, 2023, 67(5): 23-30. doi: 10.12338/j.issn.2096-9015.2022.0270

PDF( 1263 KB)

An Overview of Algorithm Traceability

doi: 10.12338/j.issn.2096-9015.2022.0270

WANG Tingting,
CUI Weiqun^,

National Institute of Metrology, Beijing 100029, China

Received Date: 2022-11-15
Accepted Date: 2023-01-11
Rev Recd Date: 2023-06-16

Available Online: 2023-06-29

Publish Date: 2023-05-31

Abstract

Abstract

In the digital age, software algorithms imbued with artificial intelligence and other next-generation information technologies serve as crucial factors accelerating the digital transformation of the manufacturing sector. The concept of algorithm traceability has been proposed based on the distinct characteristics manifested by measuring instruments and standards during metrological value transfer and traceability in various stages of the industrial revolution, along with the impact of software algorithms within measuring instruments on the accuracy and reliability of metrological values. The objective of this concept is to quantitatively assess the output values of software algorithms during their execution from a metrological traceability perspective, thereby ensuring their precision and dependability. This paper offers a comprehensive exposition of algorithm traceability, including its definition, reference standards, methodologies, and traceability outcomes. Current research trends in algorithm traceability are discussed, laying a theoretical groundwork for further exploration into metrological applications of algorithm traceability.
- metrology,
- software algorithm,
- algorithm traceability,
- standard reference data,
- algorithm standard

FullText(HTML)

References(31)

References

[1]	Rojko A. Industry 4.0 concept: Background and overview[J]. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 2017, 11(5): 77-90. doi: 10.3991/ijim.v11i5.7072
[2]	Dalenogare L S, Benitez G B, Ayala N F, et al. The expected contribution of Industry 4.0 technologies for industrial performance[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2018, 204: 383-394. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.08.019
[3]	Ghobakhloo M. Industry 4.0, digitization, and opportunities for sustainability[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 252: 119869. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119869
[4]	Wang J, Wu H, Chen Y. Made in China 2025 and manufacturing strategy decisions with reverse QFD[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2020, 224: 107539. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.107539
[5]	Zhong R Y, Xu X, Klotz E, et al. Intelligent manufacturing in the context of industry 4.0: a review[J]. Engineering, 2017, 3(5): 616-630. doi: 10.1016/J.ENG.2017.05.015
[6]	Chen Y. Integrated and intelligent manufacturing: perspectives and enablers[J]. Engineering, 2017, 3(5): 588-595. doi: 10.1016/J.ENG.2017.04.009
[7]	Durakbasa N M, Bas G, Bauer J M, et al. Development of an advanced metrology and intelligent quality management as a strategic approach in manufacturing industry[C]. LMPMI, 2014.
[8]	Yin P, Wang J, Lu C. Measuring software test verification for complex workpieces based on virtual gear measuring instrument[J]. Measurement Science Review, 2017, 17(4): 197-207. doi: 10.1515/msr-2017-0023
[9]	汤洁, Härtig F, 石照耀. 计量软件溯源中的TraCIM软件认证系统[J]. 工具技术, 2017, 51(12): 4. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7008.2017.12.031
[10]	Hopp T H, Levenson M S. Performance Measures for Geometric Fitting in the NIST Algorithm Testing and Evaluation Program for Coordinate Measurement Systems[J]. Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology, 1995, 100(5): 563-574. doi: 10.6028/jres.100.042
[11]	Velychko O M, Gaman V V, Gordiyenko T B, et al. Testing of measurement instrument software with the purpose of conformity assessment[J]. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 2019, 97: 19-26.
[12]	Boccardo D R, Machado R C S, Camara S M, et al. Software validation of medical instruments[C]. IEEE, 2014.
[13]	崔伟群. 计量器具软件测评体系研究[J]. 中国计量, 2010, 174(5): 68-69. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9364.2010.05.032
[14]	李东升, 郭天太. 量值传递与溯源[M]. 杭州: 浙江大学出版社, 2009.
[15]	Matsumoto E. The History of Electric Measuring Instruments and Active Components[C]. IEEE, 2004.
[16]	Yang F Q. Thinking on the development of software engineering technology[J]. Journal of software, 2005, 16(1): 1-7. doi: 10.1360/jos160001e
[17]	崔伟群. 欧盟关于计量器具软件测评的现状与发展[J]. 中国计量, 2012(8): 19-22. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9364.2012.08.010
[18]	Roy B K, Santhosh K V. An intelligent instrument for measuring liquid level[C]. IEEE, 2011.
[19]	Topolsky D V, Topolskaya I G, Topolsky N D. Intelligent instrument transformer for control systems of digital substations[C]. IEEE, 2018.
[20]	Khanafer M, Shirmohammadi S. Applied AI in instrumentation and measurement: The deep learning revolution[J]. IEEE Instrumentation & Measurement Magazine, 2020, 23(6): 10-17.
[21]	Cai L, Gao J, Zhao D. A review of the application of deep learning in medical image classification and segmentation[J]. Annals of Translational Medicine, 2020, 8(11): 713. doi: 10.21037/atm.2020.02.44
[22]	Shu X, Wang X, Zang X, et al. Large-Scale Spatio-Temporal Person Re-identification: Algorithms and Benchmark[J]. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 2021, 32(7): 4390-4403.
[23]	Wu D, Zheng S J, Zhang X P, et al. Deep learning-based methods for person re-identification: A comprehensive review[J]. Neurocomputing, 2019, 337: 354-371. doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2019.01.079
[24]	崔伟群, 田锋, 李颖. 数字计量学导论[M]. 北京: 中国质检出版社, 2014.
[25]	靳浩元, 刘军. 测量不确定度的评定方法及应用研究[J]. 计量科学与技术, 2021, 65(5): 124-131. doi: 10.12338/j.issn.2096-9015.2020.9002
[26]	汪斌, 卢晓华. 一元线性校准曲线不确定度评定与适用条件的讨论[J]. 计量科学与技术, 2022, 66(7): 45-49, 44.
[27]	Thiel F. Digital transformation of legal metrology-the European metrology cloud[J]. OIML Bulletin, 2018, 59(1): 10-21.
[28]	Chalk S J, Coppa D N, Flamenco F, et al. International development of the SI in FAIR digital data[J]. Measurement: Sensors, 2021, 18: 100293. doi: 10.1016/j.measen.2021.100293
[29]	Neyezhmakov P, Zub S, Pivnenko S. Preliminary E-infrastructure for Digital Calibration Certificate[J]. Measurement: Sensors, 2021, 18: 100332. doi: 10.1016/j.measen.2021.100332
[30]	窦晨, 周自力. 数字世界计量的重要性及计量的发展方向探析[J]. 计量科学与技术, 2022, 66(9): 70-73. doi: 10.12338/j.issn.2096-9015.2022.0168
[31]	Varshney A, Garg N, Nagla K S, et al. Challenges in sensors technology for industry 4.0 for futuristic metrological applications[J]. MAPAN, 2021, 36(2): 215-226. doi: 10.1007/s12647-021-00453-1