Volume 67 Issue 8
Aug.  2023
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
GUO Binbin, WANG Xiaofei. Calibration Research of Digital Recorders for Impulse Measurements[J]. Metrology Science and Technology, 2023, 67(8): 61-68. doi: 10.12338/j.issn.2096-9015.2023.0203
Citation: GUO Binbin, WANG Xiaofei. Calibration Research of Digital Recorders for Impulse Measurements[J]. Metrology Science and Technology, 2023, 67(8): 61-68. doi: 10.12338/j.issn.2096-9015.2023.0203

Calibration Research of Digital Recorders for Impulse Measurements

doi: 10.12338/j.issn.2096-9015.2023.0203
  • Received Date: 2023-08-10
  • Accepted Date: 2023-09-21
  • Rev Recd Date: 2023-10-11
  • Available Online: 2023-10-31
  • Publish Date: 2023-08-18
  • This study aims to ensure the accuracy and reliability of voltage and current measurement systems used in impulse testing by examining and quantifying the impact of digital recorders on impulse measurement outcomes. It focuses on the influence of range selection in digital recorders and evaluates their performance within these systems. The paper outlines calibration methods, procedures, and principles for impulse-specific digital recorders, discussing the technical specifications and calibration device feasibility. The study also proposes an experimental approach to evaluate the effect of range selection on digital recorders, using high-precision models PXI-5124, PXIe-5164, and PXIe-5172. Results reveal a consistent relationship between measurement range and error: larger ranges result in greater peak errors but reduced time parameter errors. Optimal measurement ranges for peak and time parameter accuracy are identified for each recorder. Furthermore, a methodology to calculate recorder uncertainty is presented. For the PXIe-5164 at a 10V range, under a 0.84/60 waveform, the expanded uncertainty (k=2) was determined: Ut at 0.15%, T1 at 2.1%, and T2 at 0.51%. This research thoroughly assesses digital recorder performance, their role in the uncertainty of impulse measurement systems, and contributes to enhancing both the theoretical and practical aspects of these systems.
  • loading
  • [1]
    Jiawei L N C. Development of a calibration system of digital recorders for impulse tests[C]. IEEE, 2008: 250-251.
    [2]
    Schon K, Schon K. Digital Recorders, Software and Calibrators[J]. High Voltage Measurement Techniques: Fundamentals, Measuring Instruments, and Measuring Methods, 2019: 223-251.
    [3]
    Sato S, Sasaki M. Resolutions of digital recorder and evaluated impulse voltage waveform parameters[C]. IEEE, 2007: 1278-1281.
    [4]
    Miyazaki S, Goshima H, Wakimoto T, et al. Long‐Term Stability of Reference Measuring System for Impulse High Voltage[J]. IEEJ Transactions on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, 2022, 17(3): 369-377. doi: 10.1002/tee.23520
    [5]
    Yonggang H, Peng X, Xiaolin Q, et al. Effect of sampling rate on data acquisition card to gamma ray energy resolution of the digital spectrometer[C]. IEEE, 2007: 4-809-4-812.
    [6]
    杨学昌. 数字记录仪动态特性校准新方法[J]. 高电压技术, 1993(2): 5-10.
    [7]
    李昕, 国亚磊, 穆生乐, 等. 数字示波器的计量精度影响原因分析[J]. 电子技术, 2023, 52(1): 228-229.
    [8]
    Hallstrom J K, Chekurov Y Y, Aro M M. A calculable impulse voltage calibrator for calibration of impulse digitizers[J]. IEEE Transactions on instrumentation and measurement, 2003, 52(2): 400-403. doi: 10.1109/TIM.2003.810714
    [9]
    Zhang X, Long Z, Zong X. Impulse voltage calibrator used in traceability[J]. High Voltage Engineering, 2015, 41(8): 2810-2817.
    [10]
    Miyazaki S, Goshima H, Shimoyama A, et al. Calibration Scheme of Impulse‐High‐Voltage Measuring System Traceable to National Standards of Japan[J]. IEEJ Transactions on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, 2021, 16(12): 1664-1671. doi: 10.1002/tee.23461
    [11]
    Li W, Long Z, Fan J, et al. Research on Optimizing the Stability of Impulse Voltage Calibrator used in Traceability[C]. IEEE, 2021: 562-567.
    [12]
    王月胜, 廖维, 朱宇洁. 一种改进的非接触式静电电压表自动校准装置研制[J]. 计量科学与技术, 2023, 67(2): 48-52. doi: 10.12338/j.issn.2096-9015.2022.0119
    [13]
    Li Y, Rungis J, McComb T R, et al. International comparison of a pulse calibrator used in high-voltage impulse calibration[J]. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 2001, 50(2): 430-435. doi: 10.1109/19.918159
    [14]
    李文婷, 刘少波, 龙兆芝, 等. 可溯源冲击电压校准器特性研究[J]. 中国测试, 2016, 42(1): 31-34.
    [15]
    Wakimoto T, Hallstrom J K, Chekurov Y, et al. High-accuracy comparison of lightning and switching impulse calibrators[J]. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 2007, 56(2): 619-623. doi: 10.1109/TIM.2007.891060
    [16]
    国家质量监督检验检疫总局. 高电压冲击测量仪器和软件 第1部分: 对仪器的要求: GB/T 16896.1-2005 [S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2005.
    [17]
    Zhaozhi L, Shaobo L I U, Wenting L I. Verification and comparison of impulse voltage measuring software[J]. High Voltage Apparatus, 2014, 50(6): 91-97.
    [18]
    葛震, 尹泉, 张茜, 等. 冲击电压测量仪器和测量软件的量值溯源的研究[J]. 工业计量, 2021, 31(3): 16-18.
    [19]
    王建生. 高电压试验技术 第1部分: 一般定义及试验要求: GB/T16927.1-2011[S]. 西安: 西安高压电器研究院有限责任公司, 2010.
    [20]
    国家质量监督检验检疫总局. 高电压和大电流试验测量用仪器和软件 第2部分: 对冲击电压和冲击电流试验用软件的要求: GB/T 16896.2-2016 [S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2016.
    [21]
    李启丙. 数字示波器中波形参数自动测量算法研究[J]. 计算技术与自动化, 2011, 30(3): 87-89. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-6199.2011.03.020
    [22]
    Bing W, Zhen F, Ji R, et al. Evaluation of uncertainty in measurement of high voltage pulse[J]. 强激光与粒子束, 2017, 29(5): 055001. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201729.170001
    [23]
    Konglaithong S, Yutthagowith P. Measuring System for Parameter Evaluation of Full Lightning Impulse Voltage Waveform[C]. IEEE, 2022: 46-49.
    [24]
    任稳柱, 冯建华, 葛震, 等. 800kV标准冲击电压测量系统及其不确定度的评定[J]. 计量学报, 2008(2): 153-158.
    [25]
    德国标准化学会. 高压试验技术. 第1部分: 通用定义和试验要求: EN 60060-1-2011 [S]. 德国, 2011.
    [26]
    德国标准化学会. 高压试验技术. 第2部分: 测量系统: EN 60060-2-2011 [S]. 德国, 2011.
    [27]
    朱宇通, 宋民, 王文龙, 等. 8Bit 1GHz数字存储示波器测量不确定度评定[J]. 中国集成电路, 2023, 32(4): 83-91. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1681-5289.2023.04.015
    [28]
    曾亚斌, 肖宇行, 刘梓俊. 冲击电压测量系统的校准与不确定度评定[J]. 中国计量, 2022(10): 108-110.
    [29]
    Hall B D, White D R. Digital representation of measurement uncertainty[J]. Measurement:Sensors, 2021, 18: 100074. doi: 10.1016/j.measen.2021.100074
    [30]
    王为农. 校准: 定义的解读和结果的测量不确定度表达[J]. 计量科学与技术, 2023, 67(2): 58-61. doi: 10.12338/j.issn.2096-9015.2022.0225
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(6)  / Tables(6)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (124) PDF downloads(26) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return