Study on the Impact of Cell Viability Detection and Processing Methods on Drug Effect Evaluation

YANG Lulu; GONG Xiaoyun; ZENG Qingli; ZHANG Wenquan; SHENTU Xuping; XUE Zhichao

doi:10.12338/j.issn.2096-9015.2023.0358

Volume 68 Issue 4

Apr. 2024

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Metrology Science and Technology > 2024 > 68(4): 60-65, 44

YANG Lulu, GONG Xiaoyun, ZENG Qingli, ZHANG Wenquan, SHENTU Xuping, XUE Zhichao. Study on the Impact of Cell Viability Detection and Processing Methods on Drug Effect Evaluation[J]. Metrology Science and Technology, 2024, 68(4): 60-65, 44. doi: 10.12338/j.issn.2096-9015.2023.0358

Citation:

YANG Lulu, GONG Xiaoyun, ZENG Qingli, ZHANG Wenquan, SHENTU Xuping, XUE Zhichao. Study on the Impact of Cell Viability Detection and Processing Methods on Drug Effect Evaluation[J]. Metrology Science and Technology, 2024, 68(4): 60-65, 44. doi: 10.12338/j.issn.2096-9015.2023.0358

Citation:

YANG Lulu, GONG Xiaoyun, ZENG Qingli, ZHANG Wenquan, SHENTU Xuping, XUE Zhichao. Study on the Impact of Cell Viability Detection and Processing Methods on Drug Effect Evaluation[J]. Metrology Science and Technology, 2024, 68(4): 60-65, 44. doi: 10.12338/j.issn.2096-9015.2023.0358

PDF( 1304 KB)

Study on the Impact of Cell Viability Detection and Processing Methods on Drug Effect Evaluation

doi: 10.12338/j.issn.2096-9015.2023.0358

YANG Lulu^{1, 2
,},
GONG Xiaoyun²,
ZENG Qingli^{1, 2},
ZHANG Wenquan^{1, 2},
SHENTU Xuping^{1
,
,},
XUE Zhichao^{2
,
,}

1.
China Jiliang University, Hangzhou 322002, China
2.
National Institute of Metrology, Beijing 100029, China

Received Date: 2023-12-21
Accepted Date: 2023-12-25
Rev Recd Date: 2023-12-28

Available Online: 2024-03-08

Publish Date: 2024-04-01

Abstract

Abstract

When conducting drug experiments on cells cultured in vitro, drug treatment can cause cell death, and different methods for detecting cell survival rates can impact the experimental results. This study uses HeLa cells as the experimental object and treats the cells with different concentrations of cisplatin. The cell survival rates detected with or without floating cells in the old culture medium are compared. The experimental results indicate that when using the CCK-8 method to detect the cell survival rates in 96-well and 24-well plates, the cell survival rates of the experimental group without removing the old culture medium are higher than those of the experimental group with the old culture medium removed. At a cisplatin concentration of 0.625 μM, there is a significant difference in cell survival rates between the experimental groups with and without the removal of the old medium. In 6-well plates and 100 mm dishes, a cell counter is used to detect the floating cells in the cell culture medium after drug application, and the presence of viable cells among the floating cells in the medium is found. The results suggest that the floating viable cells in the culture medium after drug treatment can affect the accuracy of the cell drug experiment results, and removing the old culture medium will remove these viable cells.
- metrology,
- cell cytometry,
- detection methods,
- cell viability,
- drug effects,
- in vitro culture

FullText(HTML)

References(31)

References

[1]	Lian-Shun Feng. Development and Advances of Drugs for Cancer Theranostics – PART-IV[J]. Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry, 2021, 18(21): 1644.
[2]	Tosca E. M, Ronchi D, Facciolo D, et al. Replacement, Reduction and Refinement of Animal Experiments in Anticancer Drug Development: The Contribution of 3D In Vitro Cancer Models in the Drug Efficacy Assessment[J]. Biomedicines, 2023, 11: 1058. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11041058
[3]	薛志超, 赵佳威, 李永淑, 等. 细胞密度对抗癌药药效评估准确性的研究[J]. 计量科学与技术, 2023, 67(4): 57-62,56.
[4]	Jaroch K, Jaroch A, Bojko B. Cell cultures in drug discovery and development: The need of reliable in vitro-in vivo extrapolation for pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics assessment[J]. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, 2018, 147: 297-312. doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2017.07.023
[5]	Schilling K, Harris AL, Halliday AN, et al. Investigations on Zinc Isotope Fractionation in Breast Cancer Tissue Using in vitro Cell Culture Uptake-Efflux Experiments[J]. Front. Med, 2022, 8: 746532. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.746532
[6]	Faruqui Nilofar, Kummrow Andreas, Fu Boqiang, et al. Cellular Metrology: Scoping for a Value Proposition in Extra- and Intracellular Measurements[J]. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 2020, 7: 456. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2019.00456
[7]	Mirabelli, Coppola, Salvatore. Cancer Cell Lines Are Useful Model Systems for Medical Research[J]. Cancers, 2019, 11(8): 1098. doi: 10.3390/cancers11081098
[8]	薛志超, 曾嘉明, 李永淑, 等. 接种数量对细胞生长和药物作用的影响及细胞计数方法对比[J]. 计量学报, 2023, 3(44): 341-349.
[9]	Minerva, Amrita Bhat, Sonali Verma, et al. Cisplatin-based combination therapy for cancer[J]. Journal of Cancer Research and Therapeutics, 2023, 19(3): 530-536. doi: 10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_792_22
[10]	Raudenska Martin, Balvan Jan, Fojtu Michaela, et al. Unexpected therapeutic effects of cisplatin.[J]. Metallomics, 2019, 11(7): 1182-1199. doi: 10.1039/c9mt00049f
[11]	Mengdi Song, Mingxiao Cui, Kehai Liu. Therapeutic strategies to overcome cisplatin resistance in ovarian cancer[J]. European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 2022, 232: 114205. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2022.114205
[12]	Chenying Jiang, Chenjun Shen, Maowei Ni, et al. Molecular mechanisms of cisplatin resistance in ovarian cancer[J]. Genes & Diseases, 2023, 1: 1.
[13]	Liang C, Zhang Hy, Wang Yq, et al. TMED2 Induces Cisplatin Resistance in Breast Cancer via Targeting the KEAP1-Nrf2 Pathway[J]. CURR MED SCI, 2023, 43: 1023-1032. doi: 10.1007/s11596-023-2777-7
[14]	alma Y Mohamed, Hisham A Elshoky, Nayera M El-Sayed, et al. Ameliorative effect of zinc oxide-chitosan conjugates on the anticancer activity of cisplatin: Approach for breast cancer treatment[J]. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 2023, 257: 128597.
[15]	A Rane, J Jarmoshti, A Siddique, et al. Dielectrophoretic enrichment of live chemo-resistant circulating-like pancreatic cancer cells from media of drug-treated adherent cultures of solid tumors[J]. Lab Chip, 2023, 6: 10.
[16]	Grela E, Kozłowska J, Grabowiecka A. Current methodology of MTT assay in bacteria – A review[J]. Acta Histochemica, 2018, 120(4): 303-311. doi: 10.1016/j.acthis.2018.03.007
[17]	Ludmil Benov. Improved Formazan Dissolution for Bacterial MTT Assay[J]. Microbiology Spectrum, 2021, 9(3): 1.
[18]	Yanfeng Zhu, Weihui Chen, Weiqun Guan, et al. Study of As2O3 regulating proliferation and apoptosis of Tca8113 cells by inhibiting the expression of Id-1, Artificial Cells[J]. Nanomedicine, and Biotechnology, 2019, 47(1): 1932-1937.
[19]	Jun Wang , Wei Lei, Gang Li, et al. CD151 promotes proliferation and migration of SK-NEP-1 cells via the GSK-3β/P21/cyclinD signaling pathway[J]. Pathlogy-Research and Practice, 2019, 215(2): 329-334.
[20]	Ling Cai, Xijiang Qin, Zhihui Xu, et al. Comparison of Cytotoxicity Evaluation of Anticancer Drugs between Real-Time Cell Analysis and CCK-8 Method[J]. ACS Omega, 2019, 4: 12036-12042. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.9b01142
[21]	Jing-Ru Song, Na Li, Dian-Peng Li. Synthesis and anti-proliferation activity of mogrol derivatives bearing quinoline and triazole moieties[J]. Bioorganic & amp; Medicinal Chemistry Letters, 2021, 42: 128090.
[22]	de la Fuente-Jiménez J L, Rodríguez-Rivas C I, Mitre-Aguilar I B, et al. A Comparative and Critical Analysis for In Vitro Cytotoxic Evaluation of Magneto-Crystalline Zinc Ferrite Nanoparticles Using MTT, Crystal Violet, LDH, and Apoptosis Assay[J]. Mol. Sci, 2023, 24: 12860. doi: 10.3390/ijms241612860
[23]	Magdalena Boncler, Marek Różalski, Urszula Krajewska, et al. Comparison of PrestoBlue and MTT assays of cellular viability in the assessment of anti-proliferative effects of plant extracts on human endothe[J]. Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methodslial cells, 2014, 69(1): 9-16. doi: 10.1016/j.vascn.2013.09.003
[24]	Kumar Priti, Nagarajan Arvindhan, Uchil Pradeep D. Analysis of Cell Viability by the MTT Assay[J]. Cold Spring Harbor Protocols, 2018, 6: 469-472.
[25]	Yu C, Zhang X, Wang M, et al. Afatinib combined with anti-PD1 enhances immunotherapy of hepatocellular carcinoma via ERBB2/ STAT3/PD-L1 signaling[J]. Front Oncol, 2023, 13: 1198118. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1198118
[26]	Wang Junbin, Gao Jin, Chen Qinnan, et al. LncRNA LINC01116 Contributes to Cisplatin Resistance in Lung Adenocarcinoma[J]. OncoTargets and Therapy, 2020, 13: 9333-9348. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S244879
[27]	anfang Wang, Zhenhao Zhang, Wei Wan, et al. FAM19A5/S1PR1 signaling pathway regulates the viability and proliferation of mantle cell lymphoma[J]. Journal of Receptors and Signal Transduction, 2022, 42(3): 225-229. doi: 10.1080/10799893.2021.1895220
[28]	Wang Ya, Zhang Xiaomei, Zhao Boyuan, et al. Suspension State Promotes Drug Resistance of Breast Tumor Cells by Inducing ABCC3 Overexpression[J]. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 2020, 190: 410-422. doi: 10.1007/s12010-019-03084-0
[29]	Mao Yuqiang, Yu Ying, Han Yun. Influence of thoracic drainage fluid on proliferation, migration, apoptosis, and drug resistance in lung cancer cell lines[J]. Cancer Management and Research, 2019, 11: 2253-2259. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S187019
[30]	Zhuo-Ya DAI, Shuang-Mei JIN, Hong-Qin LUO, et al. LncRNA HOTAIR regulates anoikis-resistance capacity and spheroid formation of ovarian cancer cells by recruiting EZH2 and influencing H3K27 methylation[J]. Neoplasma, 2021, 68(3): 509-518. doi: 10.4149/neo_2021_201112N1212
[31]	Grimes D R, Fletcher A G. Close Encounters of the Cell Kind: The Impact of Contact Inhibition on Tumour Growth and Cancer Models[J]. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, 2020, 82(2): 20. doi: 10.1007/s11538-019-00677-y