Citation: | MA Kun, YANG Yuanchao, FENG Xiaojuan. Research Progress in Optical Quantum Pressure Standards[J]. Metrology Science and Technology. doi: 10.12338/j.issn.2096-9015.2024.0113 |
[1] |
Yang Y C, Yue J. Calculation of Effective Area for the NIM Primary Pressure Standards[J]. PTB Mitteilungen, 2011, 121(3): 266-269.
|
[2] |
Sharipov F, Yang Y C, Ricker J E, et al. Primary pressure standard based on piston-cylinder assemblies. Calculation of effective cross sectional area based on rarefied gas dynamics[J]. Metrologia, 2016, 53: 1177-1184. doi: 10.1088/0026-1394/53/5/1177
|
[3] |
王博文, 马坤, 董嘉, 等. 基于有限元分析的活塞压力计形变系数理论计算[J/OL]. 计量学报. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.1864.TB.20240226.1123.006.html.
|
[4] |
Milton M J T, Davis R, Fletcher N. Towards a new SI: a review of progress made since 2011[J]. Metrologia, 2014, 51: R21-R30. doi: 10.1088/0026-1394/51/3/R21
|
[5] |
Egan P F, Stone J A, Hendricks J H, et al. Performance of a dual Fabry-Perot cavity refractometer[J]. Opt Lett, 2015, 40(17): 3945-3948. doi: 10.1364/OL.40.003945
|
[6] |
Hendricks J. Quantum for pressure[J]. Nature Physics, 2018, 14(1): 100. doi: 10.1038/nphys4338
|
[7] |
Jousten K. A unit for nothing[J]. Nature Physics, 2019, 15: 618. doi: 10.1038/s41567-019-0530-8
|
[8] |
Gibney E. Pressure gets an upgrade[J]. Nature, 2019, 570: 424-425. doi: 10.1038/d41586-019-01950-9
|
[9] |
Egan P, Stone J A. Absolute refractometry of dry gas to ±3 parts in 109[J]. Applied optics, 2011, 50(19): 3076-3086. doi: 10.1364/AO.50.003076
|
[10] |
Ricker J , Hendricks J , Egan P , et al. Towards Photonic based Pascal Realization as a Primary Pressure Standard[J]. Journal of Physics Conference Series, 2018, 1065: 162018.
|
[11] |
Jousten K, Hendricks J, Barker D, et al. Perspectives for a new realization of the pascal by optical methods[J]. Metrologia, 2017, 54(6): S146-S161. doi: 10.1088/1681-7575/aa8a4d
|
[12] |
Egan P F, Stone J A, Ricker J E, et al. Comparison measurements of low-pressure between a laser refractometer and ultrasonic manometer[J]. The Review of scientific instruments, 2016, 87(5): 053113. doi: 10.1063/1.4949504
|
[13] |
Isak S, Thomas H, Martin Z, et al. Gas modulation refractometry for high-precision assessment of pressure under non-temperature-stabilized conditions[J]. Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A Vacuum Surfaces & Films, 2018, 36(3): 03E105.
|
[14] |
Silander I, Forssén C, Zakrisson J, et al. Optical realization of the pascal—Characterization of two gas modulated refractometers[J]. Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B, 2021, 39(4): 044201.
|
[15] |
Silvestri Z, Bentouati D, Otal P, et al. Towards an improved helium-based refractometer for pressure measurements[C]. Acta IMEKO, 2020, 9(5): 305-309.
|
[16] |
Takei Y, Arai K, Yoshida H, et al. Development of an optical pressure measurement system using an external cavity diode laser with a wide tunable frequency range[J]. Measurement, 2020, 151: 107090. doi: 10.1016/j.measurement.2019.107090
|
[17] |
Yang Y C, Rubin T, Sun J P. Characterization of a vacuum pressure standard based on optical refractometry using nitrogen developed at nim[J]. Vacuum, 2021, 194: 110598. doi: 10.1016/j.vacuum.2021.110598
|
[18] |
许玉蓉, 刘洋洋, 王进, 等. 基于气体折射率方法的真空计量[J]. 物理学报, 2020, 69: 150601. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20200706
|
[19] |
刘洋洋, 胡常乐, 孙羽, 等. 双腔比对折射率法测定气体压力[J]. 物理学报, 2022, 71(8): 55-60.
|
[20] |
聂中梁, 王新广, 王进, 等. 光学压力计的标定及应用[J/OL]. 真空与低温. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/62.1125.O4.20240219.1508.002.html.
|
[21] |
范栋, 习振华, 贾文杰, 等. 量子真空计量标准中的非极性稀薄气体折射率测量研究[J]. 物理学报, 2021, 70(4): 144-152.
|
[22] |
Yang Y C, Ma K, Rubin Tom, et al. ANALYSIS OF THE OUTGASSING IN AN OPTICAL PRESSURE STANDARD[C]. IMEKO 24thTC3, 14thTC5, 6thTC16 and 5thTC22 International Conference, 2022.
|
[23] |
Ma K, Yang Y C, Feng X J. Low-pressure performance of a Fabry–Pérot cavity based optical pressure standard working at the zero-thermal-expansion temperature[J]. Vacuum Volume, 2024, 221: 112861. doi: 10.1016/j.vacuum.2023.112861
|
[24] |
Yang Y C, Egan P F, Rubin T. Working equation for a fabry-perot cavity based optical pressure standard[C]. 2023 CCM & IMEKO International Conference on Pressure and Vacuum Metrology, 2023.
|
[25] |
Durand M, Wang Y, Lawall J. Accurate Gouy phase measurement in an astigmatic optical cavity[J]. Applied Physics B, 2012, 108: 749-753. doi: 10.1007/s00340-012-5147-x
|
[26] |
Silander I, Zakrisson J, Silva de Oliveira V, et al. In situ determination of the penetration depth of mirrors in Fabry-Perot refractometers and its influence on assessment of refractivity and pressure[J]. Opt Express, 2022, 30: 1. doi: 10.1364/OE.439226
|
[27] |
Yang Y C, Rubin T. Simulation of pressure induced length change of an optical cavity used for optical pressure standard[C]. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2018.
|
[28] |
Egan P F, Stone J A, Scherschligt J K, et al. Measured relationship between thermodynamic pressure and refractivity for six candidate gases in laser barometry[J]. Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A, 2019, 37: 031603.
|
[29] |
Egan P F, Yang Y C. Optical n(p, T90) Measurement Suite 1: He, Ar, and N2, Int. J[J]. Theosophy’s, 2023, 44: 1.
|
[30] |
Lesiuk M, Jeziorski B. First-principles calculation of the frequency-dependent dipole polarizability of argon[J]. Physical Review A, 2023, 107: 042805. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.107.042805
|
[31] |
Shaul K R S, Schultz A J, Kofke D A, et al. Semiclassical fifth virial coefficients for improved ab initio helium-4 standards[J]. Chemical Physics Letters, 2012, 531: 11-17. doi: 10.1016/j.cplett.2012.02.013
|
[32] |
Puchalski M, Piszczatowski K, Komasa J, et al. Theoretical determination of the polarizability dispersion and the refractive index of helium[J]. Physical Review A, 2016, 93(3): 032515. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.93.032515
|
[33] |
Rourke P M C. Perspective on the Refractive-Index Gas Metrology Data Landscape[J]. Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data, 2021, 50: 033104. doi: 10.1063/5.0055412
|
[34] |
Garberoglio G, Gaiser C, Gavioso R. M, et al. Ab Initio Calculation of Fluid Properties for Precision Metrology[C]. Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data, 2023.
|
[35] |
Puchalski M, Lesiuk M, Jeziorski B. Relativistic treatment of the diamagnetic susceptibility of helium[J]. Physical Review A, 2023, 108: 042812. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.108.042812
|
[36] |
Zakrisson J, Silander I, Forssén C, et al. Procedure for robust assessment of cavity deformation in Fabry-Pérot based refractometers[J]. Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B, 2020, 38: 054202.
|
[37] |
Ricker J, Douglass K O, Hendricks J, et al. Determination of distortion corrections for a fixed length optical cavity pressure standard[J]. Measurement: Sensors, 2021, 18: 1.
|
[38] |
Avdiaj S, Yang Y C, Jousten K, et al. Note: Diffusion constant and solubility of helium in ULE glass at 23 °C[J]. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 2018, 148(11): 116101. doi: 10.1063/1.5019015
|
[39] |
Takei Y, Telada S, Yoshida H, et al. Challenges of an optical pressure standard in medium vacuum measurements[J]. Measurement: Sensors, 2022, 22: 100371. doi: 10.1016/j.measen.2022.100371
|